Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Priorities
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is the clear winner, thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Elite and rapid 120W charging. However, the Google Pixel 8 Pro excels in camera quality, software experience, and long-term support, making it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Shield Glass), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 75 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Poco Shield Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, upgradable to Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.42", 0.64µm | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 24mm, (wide), 1/3.42", 0.64µm | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 34 min 50W wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | 5300 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | 24122RKC7G | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | $ 725.00 / £ 534.12 / € 495.90 | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:53h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Significantly faster charging (120W)
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 8 Elite)
- Potentially longer battery life based on active use score
- Camera details are unknown
- Software support may be shorter than Pixel
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional camera system and image processing
- Seamless Google software experience
- Long-term software support and updates
- Slower charging speed (30W)
- Less powerful processor (Tensor G3)
Display Comparison
Both devices feature excellent displays, but with key differences. The Pixel 8 Pro boasts a slightly higher peak brightness of 1600 nits compared to the Poco F7 Ultra’s 1506 nits, offering marginally better visibility in direct sunlight. However, the Poco’s display technology isn’t specified, while the Pixel 8 Pro’s LTPO panel allows for variable refresh rates, potentially improving battery efficiency. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and while color accuracy isn’t detailed for either, Google’s history suggests excellent calibration on the Pixel 8 Pro.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro’s camera is a core strength, though specific sensor details are absent in the provided data. Google’s computational photography prowess, combined with advanced image processing algorithms, consistently delivers exceptional image quality. The Poco F7 Ultra’s camera capabilities are not detailed, making a direct comparison difficult. However, Google’s focus on software optimization and features like Magic Eraser and Best Take give the Pixel 8 Pro a distinct edge for everyday photography and videography. The Pixel 8 Pro’s emphasis on both photo *and* video processing is a key differentiator.
Performance
The performance gap is significant. The Poco F7 Ultra’s Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) with its octa-core CPU (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) is designed for sustained peak performance. This contrasts sharply with the Google Tensor G3 (4nm) and its nona-core CPU (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510). The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process node provides superior power efficiency and thermal management, minimizing throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Tensor G3 excels in AI tasks, the Snapdragon 8 Elite dominates in raw processing power and GPU performance. The Poco’s RAM specification is missing, but assuming LPDDR5x, it will further enhance its performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Poco F7 Ultra offers a 62:53h endurance rating and an active use score of 13:32h, while the Pixel 8 Pro has an active use score of 11:14h and an older 90h endurance rating. Despite the Pixel 8 Pro’s older endurance rating being higher, the Poco’s active use score suggests better real-world performance. The Poco’s 120W wired charging (100% in 34 min) and 50W wireless charging are significantly faster than the Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W wired (50% in 30 min) and 23W wireless. The Pixel 8 Pro does offer reverse wireless charging and 'bypass charging', features absent on the Poco, which could be useful in specific scenarios.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra if you need uncompromising speed for gaming, demanding applications, and value fast charging above all else. It’s the ideal choice for power users and those seeking maximum performance per dollar. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prioritize a best-in-class camera system, seamless software integration with Google services, and a refined, AI-powered user experience. It’s the phone for creative professionals and those who want a consistently polished experience.