Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Android Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw speed and charging convenience, the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, coupled with 120W charging, offers a compelling package. However, the ROG Phone 8 Pro’s superior display and gaming-centric features make it the better choice for dedicated mobile gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (Up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2024, January 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Shield Glass), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 75 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 163.8 x 76.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 225 g (7.94 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Poco Shield Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10, 1600 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, upgradable to Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.42", 0.64µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 32 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1/3.2", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 24mm, (wide), 1/3.42", 0.64µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide), 1/3.2", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C (side), DisplayPort 1.4; USB Type-C (bottom), OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 34 min 50W wireless | 65W wired, PD3.0, PPS, QC5, 100% in 39 min - International 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS - India 15W wireless (Qi) 10W reverse wired |
| Type | 5300 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow | Phantom Black |
| Models | 24122RKC7G | AI2401, AI2401_A, AI2401_D |
| Price | $ 725.00 / £ 534.12 / € 495.90 | $ 1,157.98 / £ 1,693.75 / € 632.66 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:53h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 8 Elite CPU performance
- Incredibly fast 120W wired charging
- Competitive price point for flagship specs
- Potentially less refined gaming features compared to ROG Phone
- Camera system likely less advanced than ROG Phone
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
- Superior display brightness and likely LTPO technology
- Optimized gaming features and cooling system
- More comprehensive camera system (expected)
- Slower charging speeds (65W wired, 15W wireless)
- Higher price tag compared to Poco F7 Ultra
Display Comparison
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display at 1765 nits, compared to the Poco F7 Ultra’s 1506 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED technology (implied by the high brightness), the ROG Phone 8 Pro’s panel is expected to have a higher refresh rate and potentially LTPO technology for variable refresh rate, improving battery efficiency. The ROG Phone’s display is geared towards immersive gaming, while the Poco F7 Ultra’s is still excellent but less focused on maximizing visual fidelity in bright conditions.
Camera Comparison
Context data is limited for both devices regarding camera specifics. However, given the ROG Phone 8 Pro’s branding, it’s reasonable to expect a more comprehensive camera system with features like advanced video recording capabilities and potentially a larger main sensor. The Poco F7 Ultra, while likely capable, will likely prioritize value over camera innovation. The ROG Phone’s camera is positioned as a secondary feature, while the Poco may lean into computational photography to enhance image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F7 Ultra features the Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), utilizing Oryon V2 Phoenix cores, promising exceptional CPU performance with its 4.32 GHz peak clock speeds. The ROG Phone 8 Pro uses the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) with a more traditional core configuration, peaking at 3.3 GHz. While the Gen 3 is a powerhouse, the 8 Elite’s Oryon architecture is designed for superior single-core performance, potentially giving the Poco an edge in tasks that aren’t heavily multi-threaded. However, the ROG Phone 8 Pro benefits from Qualcomm’s established optimizations for gaming and thermal management. Both devices will likely feature LPDDR5x RAM, but the ROG Phone’s cooling system is a key differentiator, mitigating potential throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The ROG Phone 8 Pro achieves a longer active use score of 14:43h compared to the Poco F7 Ultra’s 13:32h, suggesting better overall battery efficiency despite a similar battery capacity (implied). The Poco F7 Ultra compensates with significantly faster charging – 120W wired, filling the battery in just 34 minutes, alongside 50W wireless. The ROG Phone 8 Pro’s 65W wired charging (39 minutes) and 15W wireless charging are slower. The Poco’s charging speed is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The ROG Phone’s endurance suggests better power management, potentially due to the more efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and optimized software.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra if you need blistering CPU performance for multitasking and demanding applications, and value incredibly fast charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who want a flagship experience without the premium gaming-focused price tag. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro if you prioritize a top-tier display for immersive gaming, a more refined software experience tailored for gamers, and don’t mind slightly slower charging in exchange for a more feature-rich gaming ecosystem.