Poco F7 Pro vs Xiaomi 14T Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 14T Pro emerges as the stronger all-rounder. Its significantly faster 120W charging (fully charging in 19 minutes) and comparable performance, thanks to the Dimensity 9300+, outweigh the Poco F7 Pro’s slight CPU clock speed advantage. However, gamers prioritizing raw CPU power may lean towards the F7 Pro.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 75 x 8.1 mm (6.31 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 37 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | 24117RK2CG | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | € 395.57 / $ 579.99 / £ 349.00 | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 70:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
- Slightly higher peak CPU clock speed
- Longer claimed battery endurance
- 1000 cycle battery life promise
- Slower charging speed (90W vs 120W)
- No wireless charging
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Significantly faster 120W wired charging
- 50W wireless charging support
- Potentially better sustained performance due to Dimensity 9300+ architecture
- Slightly lower peak display brightness
- Slightly shorter active use battery score
- Potentially less raw CPU power in short bursts
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a slightly dimmer, but still excellent, 1228 nits maximum brightness compared to the Poco F7 Pro’s 1478 nits. While the F7 Pro wins on peak brightness, the difference is unlikely to be noticeable in most real-world scenarios. Both displays utilize a 4nm chipset, which contributes to efficient power consumption. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel type, but given the flagship positioning, 120Hz OLED panels are expected on both. The higher peak brightness of the F7 Pro may benefit users consuming HDR content outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Unfortunately, the provided data lacks camera specifications. However, given the flagship positioning, both devices likely feature multi-camera systems with a primary sensor of at least 50MP. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the main sensor is highly probable for both. Image processing will likely differ, with Xiaomi’s software tuning favoring vibrant colors and the Poco potentially offering a more natural look. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive camera comparison is impossible.
Performance
Both devices utilize a 4nm process, but diverge in their chipset choices. The Poco F7 Pro features the Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, with a CPU configuration of 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520. The Xiaomi 14T Pro, conversely, employs the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ with a CPU of 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720. The Dimensity 9300+’s unusual 3x Cortex-X4 configuration suggests a focus on sustained performance, potentially mitigating thermal throttling. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 has a higher clock speed on its primary core, the Dimensity 9300+'s architecture may offer comparable real-world performance, especially in multi-threaded tasks. Both are expected to pair with LPDDR5X RAM, ensuring fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes, compared to the Poco F7 Pro’s 37 minutes with 90W charging. The 14T Pro also adds 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the F7 Pro. While the Poco F7 Pro boasts a claimed 70:08h endurance and 13:51h active use score, the 14T Pro’s 12:32h active use score is close enough that the faster charging largely compensates for any minor battery capacity differences. The 1000 cycle battery life claim for the Poco F7 Pro suggests a focus on long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro if you prioritize peak CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or emulation, and are comfortable with a slightly slower charging experience. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you value faster charging, a brighter display, and a more balanced overall experience, particularly if you frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly.