Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs. vivo X100 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and 90W charging offer a compelling package. However, the vivo X100 Pro’s camera system and 50W wireless charging provide a more refined, all-around experience for photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | vivo X100 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2023, November 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2023, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 75 x 8.1 mm (6.31 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 221 g or 225 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 37 min | 100W wired, 50% in 14 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, Sunset Orange, White |
| Models | 24117RK2CG | V2324A, V2309 |
| Price | € 395.57 / $ 579.99 / £ 349.00 | ₹ 59,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 70:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
- Superior raw processing power with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Faster wired charging (90W vs 100W, but quicker 0-100)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Limited camera information suggests a weaker camera system
- No wireless charging
vivo X100 Pro
- Strong camera focus with advanced photo/video capabilities
- 50W wireless charging and reverse wired charging
- Balanced performance from the Dimensity 9300
- Slightly less raw CPU power compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both the Poco F7 Pro and vivo X100 Pro boast excellent displays, achieving measured peak brightnesses of 1478 nits and 1472 nits respectively, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While both are bright, the slight edge to the Poco F7 Pro could be noticeable in extremely bright conditions. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO or not) are missing, but both are expected to offer adaptive refresh rates. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and color accuracy is likely to be high on both devices, typical of flagship smartphones.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X100 Pro explicitly highlights its camera capabilities, though specific sensor details are absent in the provided data. The mention of 'Photo / Video' suggests a strong focus on both aspects. The Poco F7 Pro lacks any camera specifics, implying it may not be its primary selling point. Given vivo’s history, the X100 Pro likely features a larger main sensor, advanced image stabilization (OIS), and sophisticated image processing algorithms. The absence of details on the Poco F7 Pro’s camera suggests it may rely more on software enhancements than cutting-edge hardware. Any 2MP macro cameras on either device should be considered a marketing feature rather than a significant photographic asset.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Poco F7 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) with its octa-core configuration peaking at 3.3 GHz, while the vivo X100 Pro features the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 (4nm) also with an octa-core setup, but a different core arrangement. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz provides a slight theoretical advantage in single-core tasks. However, the Dimensity 9300’s unique configuration with multiple Cortex-X4 cores could excel in multi-threaded workloads. Both utilize a 4nm process, suggesting similar thermal efficiency, but real-world testing will determine which chipset manages heat better under sustained load. The Poco F7 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM configuration is standard for this class, and the Dimensity 9300 also supports LPDDR5x, so RAM speed isn’t a differentiating factor.
Battery Life
Both phones demonstrate impressive battery life, with active use scores of 13:51h for the Poco F7 Pro and 13:53h for the vivo X100 Pro. The difference is negligible. The Poco F7 Pro offers 90W wired charging, promising a full charge in 37 minutes, while the vivo X100 Pro boasts 100W wired charging, reaching 50% in just 14 minutes. The vivo X100 Pro further adds 50W wireless charging and reverse wired charging, offering greater versatility. While the Poco F7 Pro’s 70:08h endurance rating (presumably based on a standardized test) is useful, the real-world impact of charging speed and wireless charging convenience gives the vivo X100 Pro an edge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro if you need uncompromising gaming performance, rapid charging speeds, and a more affordable price point. You’ll benefit from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s raw power and the 90W wired charging. Buy the vivo X100 Pro if you prioritize camera quality, a more balanced user experience, and the convenience of 50W wireless charging. Its Dimensity 9300 offers excellent performance, but the camera system is its standout feature.