Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE excels in battery endurance and offers a more refined software experience, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2024, October 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 75 x 8.1 mm (6.31 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 162 x 77.3 x 8 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Xclipse 940 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 75mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 37 min | 25W wired, PD, QC2, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow |
| Models | 24117RK2CG | SM-S721B, SM-S721B/DS, SM-S721U1, SM-S721U, SM-S721W, SM-S7210, SM-S721N |
| Price | € 395.57 / $ 579.99 / £ 349.00 | $ 249.74 / C$ 498.99 / £ 335.00 / € 387.00 / ₹ 34,180 |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 70:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | 42:00h endurance, 2000 cycles |
| Energy | Class A | Class B |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class C |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)
- Ultra-fast 90W charging
- Higher peak display brightness
- Potentially less refined software experience
- Shorter battery endurance compared to S24 FE
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Longer battery life and 2000 charge cycles
- Samsung’s established software ecosystem
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower processor (Exynos 2400e)
- Slower wired charging speed
Display Comparison
Both devices feature 4nm chipsets, but their displays differ subtly. The Poco F7 Pro boasts a peak brightness of 1478 nits, exceeding the S24 FE’s 1372 nits, resulting in better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Poco’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. We lack PWM frequency data, but the S24 FE’s display is known for its color accuracy, a strength potentially absent in the Poco’s more aggressively priced panel. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, suggesting a similar immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the S24 FE will likely prioritize image processing and software features. Samsung’s image processing is renowned for its vibrant colors and scene optimization. The Poco F7 Pro, while potentially having a capable sensor, will likely rely more on raw hardware and less on computational photography. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS makes a definitive comparison impossible, but the S24 FE’s brand reputation suggests a more consistent and user-friendly camera experience. We can assume both will include standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially telephoto lenses, but the Poco may cut corners on lens quality to maintain its aggressive price point.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F7 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a significant leap over the S24 FE’s Exynos 2400e (4nm). The Snapdragon’s octa-core configuration, with its 3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, promises superior CPU performance. The Exynos 2400e’s 10-core setup attempts to compensate, but its clock speeds are lower across the board. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher frame rates in demanding games on the Poco. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s superior thermal efficiency also suggests less throttling during sustained workloads. The S24 FE’s performance will be adequate for most tasks, but the Poco F7 Pro offers a demonstrably more powerful experience.
Battery Life
The Poco F7 Pro delivers 70:08h of endurance, while the S24 FE achieves 42:00h. This is a substantial difference, despite the S24 FE having a larger battery capacity (implied, as mAh is not provided). The Poco’s active use score of 13:51h versus the S24 FE’s 11:48h further reinforces this. The Poco’s 90W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving 100% charge in just 37 minutes, compared to the S24 FE’s slower 25W charging (50% in 30 minutes). The S24 FE does offer 15W wireless and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Poco, but the sheer speed of the Poco’s wired charging is a significant advantage for users who prioritize convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro if you need uncompromising gaming performance, lightning-fast charging, and don't mind a potentially less polished software experience. You're a power user who values specs above all else. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE if you prefer a more balanced device with excellent battery life, a familiar Samsung interface, and a longer-term software support commitment. You prioritize reliability and ecosystem integration.