Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro vs. Oppo Find X7: A Head-to-Head Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, coupled with a respectable 70:08h battery endurance, offers a compelling package. However, the Oppo Find X7’s significantly faster charging is a strong counterpoint for those who value convenience above all else.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | Oppo Find X7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5 , 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 75 x 8.1 mm (6.31 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 162.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm or 9.0 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 37 min | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown, Purple |
| Models | 24117RK2CG | PHZ110 |
| Price | € 395.57 / $ 579.99 / £ 349.00 | About 520 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 70:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
- Superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Longer battery endurance (70:08h)
- Competitive price point
- Slower charging speed (37 minutes to 100%)
- MIUI software can be polarizing
Oppo Find X7
- Ultra-fast 100W charging (26 minutes to 100%)
- Potentially optimized image processing with ColorOS
- Strong CPU performance with Dimensity 9300
- Battery endurance likely lower than Poco F7 Pro
- May be more expensive than Poco F7 Pro
Display Comparison
Both devices feature 4nm chipsets, but the display experience differs. The Poco F7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1478 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While Oppo doesn’t provide brightness data, their flagship devices typically deliver vibrant displays. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to balance smoothness and power consumption. Bezels and color accuracy are likely comparable, given both brands’ focus on premium aesthetics, but detailed testing would be needed to confirm.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, both brands typically equip their flagships with high-resolution sensors and optical image stabilization (OIS). The focus will likely be on image processing algorithms. Oppo’s ColorOS is known for its natural-looking images, while Xiaomi’s MIUI often leans towards more vibrant and saturated colors. The absence of information on sensor sizes makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. Any 2MP macro lenses on either device should be considered a marketing gimmick rather than a significant photographic asset.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F7 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) features a unique CPU configuration: 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520. This contrasts with the Oppo Find X7’s MediaTek Dimensity 9300 (4nm) which utilizes 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720. The Snapdragon’s higher clock speed on the prime core and more efficient mid-cores suggest a slight edge in single-core performance and sustained multi-core workloads. However, the Dimensity 9300’s three X4 cores could provide competitive performance in heavily threaded tasks. Thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is known for its efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Poco F7 Pro delivers a measured battery endurance of 70:08h, with 13:51h of active use, indicating a robust battery life. The Oppo Find X7’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 100W wired charging (PD) significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro’s 90W (PD3.0, QC3+). The Find X7 can reach 50% charge in just 10 minutes and 100% in 26 minutes, a substantial advantage for users who need a quick top-up. While the Poco F7 Pro takes 37 minutes for a full charge, its longer overall endurance may offset this difference for some users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding games and applications, and value maximizing performance per dollar. You’ll benefit from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s efficiency and the longer battery life. Buy the Oppo Find X7 if you prioritize incredibly fast charging – getting from 0 to 100% in just 26 minutes – and prefer a streamlined user experience with Oppo’s ColorOS. This is the phone for those who can’t afford to be tethered to a charger for long.