Poco F7 Pro vs Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and value, the Poco F7 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and 90W charging offer a significant advantage, especially for gamers and power users. However, the Pixel 8 Pro’s superior camera system and software support make it a compelling choice for photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 75 x 8.1 mm (6.31 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 37 min | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | 24117RK2CG | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | € 395.57 / $ 579.99 / £ 349.00 | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 70:08h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
- Significantly faster charging (90W)
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)
- Potentially better battery life (Active use score)
- Less refined software experience
- Camera likely inferior to Pixel 8 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Superior camera system and image processing
- Seamless Google software integration and AI features
- Long-term software support
- Slower charging (30W)
- Less powerful processor (Tensor G3)
- Higher price
Display Comparison
Both devices feature 4nm chipsets, but their displays differ significantly. The Pixel 8 Pro boasts a higher peak brightness of 1600 nits compared to the Poco F7 Pro’s 1478 nits, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While the difference isn’t massive, the Pixel 8 Pro’s display is likely to have superior color accuracy and calibration, typical of Google’s flagship devices. The Poco F7 Pro, however, doesn’t specify refresh rate, which is a key omission; the Pixel 8 Pro is expected to have a variable refresh rate (LTPO) for improved efficiency. The lack of LTPO on the Poco could impact battery life during prolonged use.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro’s camera system is its defining feature. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Google’s computational photography prowess is well-established. The Pixel 8 Pro leverages its Tensor G3 chip to deliver exceptional image processing, particularly in low-light conditions and dynamic range. The Poco F7 Pro, while likely equipped with a capable sensor, will rely more on hardware than software for image quality. The Pixel 8 Pro’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, with advanced stabilization and cinematic modes. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Poco F7 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult, but Google’s track record suggests a clear advantage in image quality and features.
Performance
The Poco F7 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a clear advantage over the Google Tensor G3 (4nm) in terms of raw processing power. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s octa-core configuration, with its Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, is designed for peak performance, while the Tensor G3’s nona-core setup, topped by a Cortex-X3 at 3.0 GHz, focuses more on AI and machine learning tasks. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher frame rates in demanding games on the Poco F7 Pro. The Tensor G3 excels in on-device AI processing, powering features like Magic Eraser and real-time translation, but it falls behind in sustained CPU and GPU performance.
Battery Life
The Poco F7 Pro boasts a 70:08h endurance rating and 90W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 37 minutes. In contrast, the Pixel 8 Pro offers a 90h endurance rating (older data) and slower 30W wired charging, taking 30 minutes to reach 50%. While the Pixel 8 Pro offers 23W wireless and reverse wireless charging, the Poco F7 Pro’s significantly faster wired charging is a major convenience factor. The Poco F7 Pro’s active use score of 13:51h also surpasses the Pixel 8 Pro’s 11:14h, suggesting better real-world battery performance despite potentially having a smaller capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding applications, coupled with incredibly fast charging and a bright display, all at a significantly lower price point. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prioritize a best-in-class camera experience, seamless software integration with Google’s AI features, and long-term software support, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power and charging speed.