Poco F6 vs Nothing Phone (2a) Plus: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the Poco F6 emerges as the winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset. However, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus excels in battery endurance, offering over 6 hours more active use, making it ideal for users who value longevity over peak performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F6 | Nothing Phone (2a) Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2024, July 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 23 | Available. Released 2024, August 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.5 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.76" |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, 2-100% in 35 min | 50W wired, 50% in 21 min, 100% in 56 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Titanium | Black, Grey |
| Models | 24069PC21G, 24069PC21I | A142P |
| Price | $ 319.99 / £ 215.00 / € 284.99 / ₹ 20,499 | € 269.90 / ₹ 22,599 |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco F6
- Significantly faster processor for gaming and demanding tasks
- Higher peak display brightness for better outdoor visibility
- 90W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Shorter battery life compared to the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Exceptional battery life for all-day use
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Unique and minimalist design
- Slower charging speed compared to the Poco F6
- Less powerful processor for intensive gaming
Display Comparison
Both devices feature 4nm chipsets, allowing for efficient display operation. The Poco F6 boasts a peak brightness of 1218 nits, exceeding the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s 1097 nits. This difference translates to better visibility in direct sunlight for the Poco F6. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on market segment), the Poco F6’s higher brightness suggests a potentially more vibrant and punchy image. The absence of LTPO technology in either device means refresh rate scaling won’t be as power-efficient as on flagship models, but both likely offer adaptive refresh rates to balance smoothness and battery consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset’s ISP capabilities play a role. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 generally offers more advanced image processing features. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s Dimensity 7350 Pro is still capable, but may not match the Poco F6’s low-light performance or dynamic range. Given the market positioning, both phones likely prioritize a versatile main camera, but the Poco F6’s more powerful ISP could provide an edge in image quality and video recording.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F6’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) features a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, paired with 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 performance cores and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520 efficiency cores. This configuration is designed for sustained high performance. In contrast, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4nm) with a 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 core and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 cores. While the Dimensity 7350 Pro is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core provides a significant advantage in single-core performance, crucial for responsiveness and demanding applications. The Poco F6 will likely exhibit superior GPU performance, benefiting gamers.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus demonstrably wins in battery life, achieving 16:34 hours of active use compared to the Poco F6’s 10:36 hours. This over 6-hour difference is substantial. While the Poco F6 compensates with 90W wired charging (2-100% in 35 minutes), the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s 50W charging (50% in 21 minutes, 100% in 56 minutes) is slower. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s superior battery life suggests a more efficient chipset and potentially a larger battery capacity, despite not being explicitly stated. The Poco F6’s faster charging is convenient, but the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus minimizes the need to charge frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F6 if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, video editing, or other resource-intensive applications. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset delivers a noticeable advantage in these scenarios. Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus if you prioritize all-day battery life, a clean software experience, and a distinctive design. The Dimensity 7350 Pro provides ample power for everyday tasks while maximizing efficiency.