Poco F6 vs. Motorola Edge 50 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and gaming, the Poco F6 is the clear winner, leveraging the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro offers a more refined charging experience and slightly better battery life, making it ideal for those who value convenience and longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F6 | Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2024, April 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 23 | Available. Released 2024, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 720 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, 2-100% in 35 min | 125W wired, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Titanium | Luxe Lavender, Black Beauty, Moonlight Pearl, Vanilla Cream |
| Models | 24069PC21G, 24069PC21I | XT2403-2 |
| Price | $ 319.99 / £ 215.00 / € 284.99 / ₹ 20,499 | € 410.57 / $ 399.00 / £ 369.99 / ₹ 22,995 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco F6
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Faster gaming performance
- Competitive price for the performance offered
- Shorter battery life in active use
- Slower wired charging compared to the Edge 50 Pro
- Potential for more thermal throttling
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
- Longer battery life
- Significantly faster 125W wired charging
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging support
- Less powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Lower peak gaming performance
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
Both the Poco F6 and Motorola Edge 50 Pro feature displays capable of reaching high brightness levels, with the Edge 50 Pro edging out the F6 at 1295 nits compared to 1218 nits. While both are excellent for outdoor visibility, the difference is noticeable. The lack of LTPO technology in either device means refresh rate scaling isn't as efficient as on flagship models, but both likely offer adaptive refresh rates to conserve power. Without panel type specifics, it's difficult to assess color accuracy, but both brands generally deliver acceptable results in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the Poco F6 has a processing advantage for image signal processing (ISP). The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s ISP is more advanced, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 ISP is still competent, but likely won’t match the Poco F6 in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of information on sensor sizes and OIS makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the Poco F6’s processing power gives it an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F6’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) boasts a prime Cortex-X4 core clocked at 3.0 GHz, promising significantly higher peak performance than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm). The 7 Gen 3 utilizes a Cortex-A715 prime core at 2.63 GHz. While the 7 Gen 3 is a capable chip, the 8s Gen 3 offers a substantial leap in GPU performance, crucial for gaming. The Poco F6’s CPU configuration (1+4+3) also suggests a more aggressive performance profile. The Edge 50 Pro's CPU configuration (1+4+3) with A715 cores is more focused on efficiency. The Poco F6 will likely exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load, but will deliver higher initial performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 11:59h compared to the Poco F6’s 10:36h. This suggests better power efficiency from the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 or a more optimized software experience. However, the Poco F6 compensates with 90W wired charging, reaching 100% in 35 minutes, while the Edge 50 Pro’s 125W charging achieves the same in just 18 minutes. The Edge 50 Pro also adds 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Poco F6.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F6 if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding games and applications, and are willing to trade off some battery life and charging speed for that performance. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Pro if you prefer a more balanced experience with faster charging, longer battery life, and a slightly more premium feel, even if it means sacrificing some raw horsepower.