Xiaomi continues to dominate the budget smartphone market, and the Poco F5 and Redmi Note 12 Turbo are prime examples. Both pack impressive specs, particularly the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, but subtle differences could make one a better fit for you. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 edges out the Redmi Note 12 Turbo thanks to its brighter display and slightly better overall feature set. Both offer incredible value with the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, but the F5's extra brightness and potentially better camera software give it a slight advantage for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, March 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, March 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Black, Blue, White, Harry Potter Edition |
| Models | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I | 23049RAD8C |
| Price | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 118h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Brighter Display (963 nits)
- Potentially better camera software
- Slightly more premium feel
- Fast 67W Charging
- Slightly higher price than Redmi Note 12 Turbo
- No official IP rating
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo
- Excellent Value for Money
- Powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Fast 67W Charging
- Clean Software Experience
- Lower peak brightness display
- Potentially less refined camera software
- No official IP rating
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth visuals. However, the Poco F5 boasts a significantly higher peak brightness of 963 nits (measured) compared to the Redmi Note 12 Turbo, which is likely around 800-900 nits. This makes the F5 noticeably better in bright sunlight. The contrast ratio is likely excellent on both, offering deep blacks and vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
The Poco F5 is expected to have a more refined camera software experience, potentially offering better image processing and more features. While both likely have a similar main sensor (likely a 64MP), the F5 might have a slightly better ultrawide or macro lens. The Redmi Note 12 Turbo's camera is still very capable, but the F5 has the potential to deliver slightly better results.
Performance
Performance is virtually identical. Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset and the same Octa-core CPU configuration. Expect snappy performance for everyday tasks, gaming, and multitasking. The differences in real-world performance will likely be negligible.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates impressive battery life with an active use score of 11:52h and an endurance rating of 118h. The Redmi Note 12 Turbo, while not explicitly stated, is expected to offer comparable battery life, likely around 10-12 hours of active use. Both support 67W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in approximately 46 minutes.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is ideal for users who prioritize a vibrant display, potentially better camera performance, and a slightly more premium feel. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo is a fantastic choice for those seeking raw performance and a streamlined experience at an even more competitive price, especially if display brightness isn't a top concern.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 good for gaming?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a very capable chipset for gaming, offering smooth performance and good graphics rendering for most mobile games.
❓ Do both phones have 5G connectivity?
Yes, both the Poco F5 and Redmi Note 12 Turbo support 5G connectivity.
❓ What is the storage and RAM configuration available?
Both phones typically offer configurations like 8GB/128GB, 8GB/256GB, and 12GB/256GB, but availability may vary by region.
