Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Redmi Note 12 Pro+: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 offers a more powerful chipset and a brighter display, making it ideal for gamers and media consumers. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts significantly faster charging and a potentially better camera system, appealing to those prioritizing speed and photography. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F5 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 208.4 g (7.34 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition |
| Models | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I | 22101316UCP, 22101316UG |
| Price | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 | $ 348.00 / £ 439.00 / € 399.00 / ₹ 29,949 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 118h | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 498710 (v9) GeekBench: 2208 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F5
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2)
- Brighter display (963 nits)
- Better endurance rating (118h)
- Faster wired charging (67W)
- Camera performance potentially not as good as Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Design might be less premium than Redmi Note 12 Pro+
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Incredibly fast charging (120W)
- Potentially better camera (higher resolution sensor)
- Stylish design
- Good value for money
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Lower endurance rating (88h)
- Display brightness likely lower than Poco F5
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 963 nits, offering better outdoor visibility. Both phones feature excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the F5's higher brightness gives it an edge. Both likely use AMOLED panels with vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is rumored to have a higher resolution main sensor (likely 200MP), potentially leading to more detailed photos. However, image processing and software optimization play a crucial role, so real-world camera performance needs further testing. Both likely offer a variety of shooting modes.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset is noticeably more powerful than the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s Dimensity 1080. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading, and overall better performance in demanding tasks. The F5's CPU configuration also suggests better sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ absolutely dominates in charging speed with its advertised 120W wired charging, promising a full charge in just 19 minutes. The Poco F5's 67W charging is still fast, but significantly slower. The Poco F5 has a slightly better endurance rating (118h vs 88h), suggesting better overall battery efficiency despite the more powerful chipset.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F5? Gamers, power users, and those who value a smooth, responsive experience and a vibrant display. Who should buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+? Photography enthusiasts, users who need incredibly fast charging, and those seeking a stylish design.