Xiaomi offers a range of excellent mid-range phones, and the Poco F5 and Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G are two popular contenders. Both offer compelling features at competitive prices, but cater to slightly different users. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset and brighter display. While the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G offers a solid experience, the F5's performance advantage makes it the better choice for most users seeking a responsive and future-proof device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, March 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 201.8 g (7.13 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 700 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min | 67W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Star Blue, Graphite Gray, Polar White, Ice blue |
| Models | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I | 2209116AG, 2209116AG |
| Price | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 118h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Significantly faster performance
- Brighter and smoother display (likely 120Hz)
- Likely better camera processing
- Fast 67W charging
- Potentially shorter battery life than Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
- May lack some of the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G's software features
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
- Excellent battery life
- Reliable camera system
- Fast 67W charging
- Generally more affordable
- Slower performance compared to Poco F5
- Less bright display
- Likely 60Hz refresh rate
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 963 nits peak brightness compared to the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G's likely lower brightness (estimated around 600-800 nits based on typical Redmi Note series displays). Both likely feature AMOLED panels with vibrant colors and deep blacks, but the F5's higher brightness will be noticeable in outdoor conditions. The Poco F5 also likely has a higher refresh rate (120Hz vs. 60Hz on the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G), resulting in smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Poco F5 likely has a slight edge in image processing and overall quality. While specific camera specs are missing, the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G is known for its reliable main sensor and decent ultrawide lens. The Poco F5's newer chipset likely allows for better computational photography features and improved low-light performance. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable.
Performance
This is where the Poco F5 truly shines. Its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G's Snapdragon 732G. The Gen 2 offers significantly improved CPU and GPU performance, making the F5 noticeably faster for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications. The F5's 4nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G has an endurance rating of 118h, suggesting excellent battery life. The Poco F5's active use score of 11:52h is respectable, but the endurance rating of 118h suggests the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G might offer slightly longer battery life under moderate usage. Both phones support 67W fast charging, allowing for quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is ideal for gamers, power users, and anyone prioritizing performance and a vibrant display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G is a good option for budget-conscious users who value a reliable camera and long battery life, but don't need top-tier performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Poco F5 worth the extra money?
If performance is a priority, then yes. The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset provides a significant performance boost over the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Based on endurance ratings, the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G likely offers slightly better battery life under moderate usage, although both support fast charging.
