Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Xiaomi 12T: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 12T boasts significantly faster charging and a slightly more powerful chipset, while the Poco F5 offers a more refined overall experience and potentially better value. The 12T is the speed demon, the F5 the more balanced choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F5 | Xiaomi 12T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2022, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2022, October 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 163.1 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Ultra (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.47", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min | 120W wired, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Black, Silver, Blue |
| Models | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I | 22071212AG |
| Price | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 | € 181.96 / £ 283.32 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 118h | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 780204 (v9) GeekBench: 3756 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Excellent battery life
- Smooth performance
- Vibrant display
- Competitive price
- Refined software experience
- Chipset slightly less powerful than 12T
- Charging speed not as fast as 12T
Xiaomi 12T
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Powerful chipset for gaming
- Good camera performance
- Premium design
- Battery life slightly shorter than F5
- Software can feel less polished
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature bright displays with a measured peak brightness around 960 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Both have a nominal infinite contrast ratio. The Poco F5 might have slightly better color accuracy, but the difference is minimal. The 12T's display is very good, but the F5's is arguably a touch more refined.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is comparable, with both phones capable of capturing detailed photos and videos in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is decent on both, but the 12T might have a slight edge due to potentially better image processing. Both offer versatile camera systems, but neither is a class leader.
Performance
The Xiaomi 12T's MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Ultra generally edges out the Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in raw performance, particularly in demanding games. However, the Poco F5's chipset is still very capable and provides a smooth experience for most tasks. The 12T's faster CPU and GPU give it a noticeable advantage in intensive workloads.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates impressive battery endurance with an endurance rating of 118h, suggesting excellent longevity. The Xiaomi 12T's endurance rating is 104h, still respectable but less than the F5. However, the 12T's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is ideal for users prioritizing a smooth, everyday experience, a vibrant display, and excellent value. The Xiaomi 12T is best suited for those who demand blazing-fast charging, top-tier performance for gaming, and don't mind a slightly less polished software experience.