The Xiaomi Poco F5 and vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches. The Poco F5 focuses on maximizing battery life and efficiency with the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, while the iQOO Neo 7 Pro prioritizes raw processing power with the older, but still potent, Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to help you determine which device best aligns with your priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a smooth, efficient experience, the Xiaomi Poco F5 emerges as the winner. Its 11:52h active use score and 118h endurance rating significantly outperform the iQOO Neo 7 Pro, which focuses on speed at the expense of longevity. However, power users demanding maximum performance will find the iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 a more compelling choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, July 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 197 g or 202 g (6.95 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Fearless Flame, Dark Storm |
| Models | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I | I2217 |
| Price | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 | About 380 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 118h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Exceptional battery life (11:52h active use)
- Efficient Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 processor
- Fast 67W charging with PD3.0/QC4 support
- Camera specifications are unknown
- May not match the iQOO Neo 7 Pro in peak gaming performance
vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (50% in 8 minutes)
- Potentially higher peak gaming performance
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the Poco F5
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 may be prone to thermal throttling
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a display capable of reaching 963 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s reasonable to expect similar brightness levels given its positioning. Both devices likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors and deep blacks, but the Poco F5’s measured brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor usability. Contrast ratios are nominally infinite for both, typical of AMOLED technology. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests a standard 120Hz refresh rate, potentially impacting power consumption compared to adaptive refresh rate displays.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro, positioned as a performance-focused device, may prioritize image processing speed over sensor size. The absence of any mention of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on electronic image stabilization (EIS), which can introduce artifacts in video recording. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to its small sensor size and low resolution.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz, offering a theoretical performance advantage over the Poco F5’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm) with its 2.91 GHz Cortex-X2. However, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to run hotter under sustained load. The Poco F5’s 7+ Gen 2, built on the same 4nm process, benefits from improved thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s CPU configuration (3x A710 @ 2.75 GHz, 4x A510 @ 2.0 GHz) is slightly faster clocked than the Poco F5’s (3x A710 @ 2.49 GHz, 4x A510 @ 1.8 GHz), but real-world differences may be minimal. RAM specifications are not provided, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5X for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 11:52h of active use and a 118h endurance rating. This suggests a larger battery capacity and/or more efficient power management. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro, while featuring incredibly fast 120W wired charging (reaching 50% in just 8 minutes), lacks the Poco F5’s stamina. The faster charging is beneficial for users who frequently need to top up their battery, but the Poco F5’s longer runtime reduces the need for frequent charging. The Poco F5 also supports PD3.0 and QC4 charging standards, offering broader compatibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 if you need exceptional battery life for extended use, value a smooth and responsive user experience over absolute peak performance, and appreciate a more balanced approach to features. Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding games and applications, need the fastest possible charging speeds (120W), and are willing to trade some battery life for that extra performance boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the iQOO Neo 7 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to generate more heat than newer chipsets like the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. While the iQOO Neo 7 Pro likely incorporates cooling solutions, extended gaming at maximum settings may lead to thermal throttling, reducing sustained performance. The Poco F5’s more efficient processor is less susceptible to this issue.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Poco F5 compare to the 120W charging on the iQOO Neo 7 Pro in real-world usage?
While 120W charging is significantly faster on paper, the difference in practical terms may not be as dramatic. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro can reach 50% charge in 8 minutes, but the Poco F5’s 67W charging is still reasonably fast, fully charging in 46 minutes. For most users, the convenience of a longer-lasting battery on the Poco F5 may outweigh the need for the absolute fastest charging speeds.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera information a significant drawback for both phones?
Yes, the absence of sensor size, aperture, and OIS details makes it difficult to assess the camera capabilities accurately. Both phones likely offer acceptable image quality for casual use, but enthusiasts seeking advanced camera features may need to look elsewhere or wait for more detailed reviews.
