Xiaomi Poco F5 vs Samsung Galaxy A54: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 takes the lead with its significantly faster Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset and blazing-fast 67W charging. However, the Galaxy A54 boasts a slightly brighter display and Samsung's reliable software support. Ultimately, the Poco F5 offers better performance for the price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F5 | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 118h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2)
- Blazing-Fast 67W Charging
- High Brightness Display
- Competitive Price
- Potentially Less Consistent Camera Processing
- MIUI Software (can be polarizing)
- Build Quality might not be as premium as Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Vibrant and Bright Display
- Reliable Software Support (Samsung's One UI)
- Good Camera Performance
- Premium Design and Build Quality
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Exynos 1380)
- Higher Price compared to Poco F5
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with excellent contrast ratios (nominally infinite). The Galaxy A54 edges out the Poco F5 with a slightly higher peak brightness of 980 nits compared to the Poco F5's 963 nits, making it marginally better for outdoor visibility. Both offer smooth visuals, but the Poco F5 might have a slightly higher refresh rate (likely 120Hz, based on typical Poco specs) for even smoother scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective. The Galaxy A54 is known for its consistent image processing and reliable results, particularly in good lighting conditions. The Poco F5's camera is likely to offer more detail and potentially better dynamic range, but image processing might be less consistent. Both offer capable video recording, but the Galaxy A54's software stabilization might be slightly better.
Performance
This is where the Poco F5 truly shines. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Exynos 1380 found in the Galaxy A54. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Poco F5. The Poco F5's CPU configuration also contributes to its superior performance.
Battery Life
Both phones offer respectable battery life, with active use scores around 11-12 hours. The Poco F5's endurance rating (118h) is slightly better than the Galaxy A54's (119h), suggesting slightly better overall efficiency. However, the Poco F5's 67W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 100% in just 46 minutes, while the Galaxy A54's 25W charging is considerably slower.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize performance and fast charging. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a great choice for those who value a vibrant display, reliable software, and a more polished overall experience, especially if you're already invested in the Samsung ecosystem.