The Xiaomi Poco F5 and Realme GT Neo 5 240W represent compelling choices in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Poco F5 prioritizes all-day battery life and a balanced feature set, while the GT Neo 5 aggressively pushes the boundaries of charging speed, aiming to minimize downtime. This comparison dissects their core strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Xiaomi Poco F5 emerges as the winner. Its impressive 11:52h active use battery score and efficient Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset provide a smoother, more reliable experience. However, if minimizing charging time is paramount, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I | RMX3708 |
| Price | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 118h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Exceptional battery life (11:52h active use)
- Efficient Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset
- Bright display (963 nits)
- Slower charging speed (46 minutes to 100%)
- Camera specifications are unknown
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Blazing-fast 240W charging (10 minutes to 100%)
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Potentially higher peak performance
- Battery life likely shorter than Poco F5
- Battery capacity not specified
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a display capable of reaching 963 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Realme GT Neo 5’s display specifications aren’t provided, Realme typically focuses on high refresh rates. The Poco F5’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a strong OLED panel, but without comparable data for the GT Neo 5, a direct comparison is difficult. Users prioritizing outdoor visibility will likely favor the Poco F5 based on the measured brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume the GT Neo 5, positioned as a more premium device, might feature a more sophisticated camera system, but this remains speculative. Users seeking detailed camera performance should consult dedicated camera reviews for each device.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), a previous-generation flagship chipset, offering a theoretical performance advantage over the Poco F5’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm). The 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 core clocks slightly higher at 3.19 GHz versus the Poco’s 2.91 GHz. However, the 4nm fabrication process of both chips suggests comparable thermal efficiency. The Poco F5’s chipset is optimized for efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads, while the GT Neo 5 offers raw power for demanding tasks. The GT Neo 5’s chipset is a step up in raw processing power, but the Poco F5’s is more efficient.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 shines with an impressive active use battery score of 11:52h and an endurance rating of 118h, indicating exceptional battery life. The Realme GT Neo 5 240W, however, prioritizes charging speed, achieving 50% charge in just 4 minutes and 100% in 10 minutes with its 240W wired charging. This drastically reduces downtime, but the battery capacity of the GT Neo 5 is not provided. The Poco F5’s 67W charging (with PD3.0 and QC4 support) takes 46 minutes to reach 100%, a significant difference, but the trade-off is a much longer overall battery lifespan between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 if you need a phone that will comfortably last a full day of heavy use, and value a balanced experience with a focus on efficiency. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds available, and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly, even if it means potentially sacrificing some battery life in the process.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Realme GT Neo 5 240W's fast charging degrade the battery health significantly over time?
While 240W charging is incredibly fast, Realme employs technologies to mitigate battery degradation. However, consistently utilizing extremely fast charging *can* contribute to faster battery wear compared to slower charging methods. Monitoring battery health and adjusting charging habits can help prolong the battery's lifespan.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in the Poco F5 powerful enough for demanding games like Genshin Impact or PUBG?
The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a capable chipset that can handle most mobile games, including Genshin Impact and PUBG. While it won't match the peak performance of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the GT Neo 5, it provides a smooth gaming experience at high settings, especially considering its improved thermal efficiency which reduces throttling.
❓ What type of storage does the Poco F5 use, and is it expandable?
While not specified in the provided data, Poco phones typically utilize UFS 3.1 or UFS 4.0 storage for fast read/write speeds. Expandability via microSD card is unlikely, as this feature is becoming increasingly rare in modern smartphones.
❓ How does the thermal management of the Realme GT Neo 5 240W handle sustained gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to generate heat under sustained load. Realme likely incorporates a robust cooling system (vapor chamber, graphite sheets) to mitigate thermal throttling. However, prolonged gaming at maximum settings may still result in some performance reduction to maintain safe operating temperatures.
