Poco F5 vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F5 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, particularly in demanding tasks, and its superior battery endurance (118h vs 80h) translates to longer real-world usage. While the Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, the Poco F5’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F5 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 725 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 118h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) | - |
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Significantly longer battery life
- Faster overall charging time
- Slightly lower peak display brightness
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Fast 68W charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Shorter battery life
- Dimensity 7030 may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a display capable of reaching 1073 nits of peak brightness, exceeding the Poco F5’s 963 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. However, both displays share an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks. While the data doesn’t specify panel technology, Motorola often employs pOLED panels, potentially offering superior color accuracy and viewing angles compared to the Poco F5’s likely AMOLED panel. The difference in brightness is noticeable, but the Poco F5’s display remains excellent for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The context data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities for both. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a primary camera with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). The Poco F5’s advantage likely lies in Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), known for its excellent dynamic range and low-light performance. Without specific sensor size or aperture data, a definitive camera comparison is difficult, but the Poco F5’s chipset suggests a slight edge in image processing capabilities.
Performance
The Poco F5’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm) chipset represents a significant advantage over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 4nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. The Snapdragon’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 prime core alongside 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 performance cores – is architecturally superior to the Edge 40 Neo’s 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. The Poco F5 is the clear winner for performance-demanding users.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 boasts an endurance rating of 118 hours, significantly outperforming the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 80 hours. This translates to a real-world active use score of 11:52h for the Poco F5 versus 10:28h for the Edge 40 Neo. While the Edge 40 Neo offers comparable 68W wired charging, reaching 50% in 15 minutes, the Poco F5’s 67W charging (with PD3.0 and QC4 support) achieves a full charge in 46 minutes. The Poco F5’s larger battery capacity and more efficient chipset combine for a substantial battery life advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and multitasking, and require all-day battery life. It’s the ideal choice for power users and mobile gamers. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value a slightly brighter display and a potentially more refined software experience, and are willing to trade some performance and battery life for it. It’s better suited for everyday users who prioritize media consumption and social media.