Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Redmi K60: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro edges out the Redmi K60 thanks to its significantly brighter display and faster wireless charging. Both offer excellent performance, but the F5 Pro's added features and slightly more aggressive pricing make it the overall winner for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi K60 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2022, December 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, January 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 199 g or 204 g (7.02 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ 30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Black, White, Blue, Green |
| Models | 23013PC75G | - |
| Price | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 | About 350 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 99h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.2 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter Display (1059 nits)
- Faster Wireless Charging (30W)
- Slightly more modern design
- Excellent Performance
- Camera tuning may be less refined than Redmi K60
- Potential for slightly less optimized software
Xiaomi Redmi K60
- Reliable Performance
- Potentially better camera tuning
- Good Value
- Solid Build Quality
- Lower Display Brightness
- Slower Wireless Charging (30W)
- Design may be less exciting
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, significantly outperforming the Redmi K60. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (the F5 Pro's is nominally infinite), the F5 Pro's superior brightness makes it much easier to view outdoors. Both likely use AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates, but the F5 Pro's brightness is the key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
While both phones have capable camera systems, detailed specifications are missing. Generally, the Redmi K60 often features a slightly more refined camera tuning and potentially better image processing. The Poco F5 Pro might offer a more vibrant, saturated look. Testing would be needed to definitively declare a winner.
Performance
Both phones share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and CPU configuration, ensuring flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, demanding gaming, and snappy app loading on both devices. Real-world performance differences will be minimal, primarily dependent on software optimization.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Redmi K60 also offers good battery life, but lacks the specific endurance rating. Both support 67W wired charging, but the Poco F5 Pro has a significant advantage with 30W wireless charging, offering greater convenience.
Buying Guide
The Poco F5 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing a vibrant display, fast wireless charging, and a slightly more modern design. The Redmi K60 is a great choice for those seeking a reliable, well-rounded phone with a focus on long-term value and potentially a slightly more refined software experience (depending on region).