Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Poco F5: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, making it the clear winner for performance enthusiasts. However, the Poco F5 offers slightly better battery life and a more accessible price point, making it a strong contender for everyday users seeking excellent value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | 23013PC75G | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 99h | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.2 LUFS (Good) | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level performance
- Brighter display
- Wireless charging
- Fast charging (67W wired)
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Potentially higher price
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Excellent battery life
- More affordable
- Fast charging (67W wired)
- Good overall value
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower peak brightness
- No wireless charging
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate and an infinite contrast ratio. The Poco F5 Pro takes a slight edge with a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the F5's 963 nits. Both offer excellent color accuracy and sharpness.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, detailed camera specifications are missing. Based on general knowledge, the F5 Pro likely has a slightly more advanced camera setup, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor or improved image processing capabilities. Both are expected to deliver good image quality in well-lit conditions, but low-light performance may vary. Further testing would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
This is where the F5 Pro truly shines. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is a flagship-level processor, providing significantly faster performance than the F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. Expect smoother gaming, quicker app loading times, and overall snappier responsiveness on the F5 Pro. The F5 is still capable, but the Pro offers a noticeable performance boost.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates slightly better endurance in active use (11:52h) and boasts a higher endurance rating (118h) compared to the F5 Pro (99h). Both phones support 67W wired charging, allowing for rapid top-ups. The F5 Pro also includes 30W wireless charging, a feature absent in the F5.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is ideal for gamers, power users, and anyone who prioritizes raw performance. The Poco F5 is a great choice for those seeking a well-rounded smartphone with excellent battery life and a more budget-friendly price tag, without sacrificing too much on features.