Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs. Poco F4 GT: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro edges out the F4 GT thanks to its significantly brighter display and more efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chip, resulting in better battery life. While the F4 GT boasts incredibly fast 120W charging, the F5 Pro's overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | 23013PC75G | 21121210G |
| Price | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 99h | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.2 LUFS (Good) | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter Display
- More Efficient Chipset
- Longer Battery Life
- Wireless Charging (30W)
- Charging speed not as fast as F4 GT
- Camera performance potentially similar to F4 GT
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Incredibly Fast 120W Charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Aggressive Gaming Features (likely)
- Competitive Price
- Lower Peak Brightness
- Shorter Battery Life
- No Wireless Charging
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 1059 nits is substantially higher than the F4 GT, offering significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. Both have excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the F5 Pro's brightness advantage makes a noticeable difference in everyday use. Both likely use AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely similar between the two, given the 'Photo / Video' designation in the specs. Both likely feature a main sensor around 64MP, an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but potential limitations in low light. Video recording capabilities should be comparable, supporting 4K resolution.
Performance
While both phones utilize Snapdragon 8-series chips, the F5 Pro's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a more efficient and slightly faster processor than the F4 GT's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. This translates to smoother performance in demanding games and applications, and better power efficiency. Both offer ample RAM and storage options.
Battery Life
The F5 Pro's endurance rating of 99 hours significantly surpasses the F4 GT's 81 hours. Coupled with its more efficient chipset, this means the F5 Pro will comfortably last a full day, even with heavy usage. The F4 GT's 120W charging is a major advantage, allowing for incredibly quick top-ups, but the F5 Pro's larger battery and better efficiency ultimately provide a superior overall battery experience.
Buying Guide
The Poco F5 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing a vibrant display, efficient performance, and longer battery life. The Poco F4 GT is a great choice for those who value blazing-fast charging speeds and don't mind slightly shorter battery endurance.