Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Poco F3: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display and a more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, offering a noticeable performance boost. However, the Poco F3 still holds its own with exceptional battery life and a slightly lower price point. The F5 Pro is the performance king, while the F3 is the endurance champion.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2021, March 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), AF |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Arctic White, Night Black, Deep Ocean Blue, Moonlight Silver |
| Models | 23013PC75G | M2012K11AG |
| Price | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 | € 162.15 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 1.06 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 99h | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.2 LUFS (Good) | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 631850 (v8), 697216 (v9) GeekBench: 3206 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Significantly brighter display
- More powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Faster 67W charging
- Modern design
- Slightly shorter battery life than F3
- Potentially higher price
Xiaomi Poco F3
- Exceptional battery life (114h endurance)
- Slightly lower price
- Reliable performance
- Less bright display
- Older Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Slower 33W charging
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 1059 nits is substantially higher than the F3, resulting in better outdoor visibility and a more immersive viewing experience. Both have excellent contrast ratios (Infinite, nominal), but the F5 Pro's brightness is a significant advantage. The F3's display is still good, but not as impressive.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' camera setups, but detailed camera specifications are missing. Based on general knowledge, the F5 Pro likely has a slightly improved sensor and image processing due to its newer chipset. However, both are expected to deliver decent image quality in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance might be a differentiating factor, potentially favoring the F5 Pro.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro is a powerhouse, outperforming the Snapdragon 870 in the F3. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and significantly better gaming performance on the F5 Pro. While the F3 is still capable, the F5 Pro's chipset provides a noticeable edge for demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Poco F3 shines in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 114 hours, slightly better than the F5 Pro's 99 hours. While the difference isn't massive, the F3's longer battery life provides more peace of mind. The F5 Pro's 67W charging is faster than the F3's 33W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro? Gamers and power users who prioritize performance and a vibrant display will love the F5 Pro. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F3? Budget-conscious users seeking long battery life and a reliable all-around experience will find the F3 an excellent choice.