Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Xiaomi 12T Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 12T Pro takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster 120W charging and slightly improved CPU clock speeds. However, the Poco F5 Pro offers a brighter display and potentially better value for those prioritizing wireless charging and a more balanced feature set.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro | Xiaomi 12T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 75 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2022, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2022, October 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) | 163.1 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.47", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min | 120W wired, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Black, Silver, Blue |
| Models | 23013PC75G | 22081212UG, 22081212G |
| Price | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 | $ 208.76 / € 167.62 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.07 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 99h | Endurance rating 91h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.2 LUFS (Good) | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1032185 (v9) GeekBench: 4081 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter Display (1059 nits)
- Wireless Charging Support
- Excellent Value
- Good Battery Life (99h)
- Slower Charging (67W wired)
- Camera slightly behind 12T Pro
- No IP Rating
Xiaomi 12T Pro
- Incredibly Fast 120W Charging
- Slightly Faster CPU
- Potentially Better Camera Performance
- Premium Build Quality
- Lower Peak Brightness (913 nits)
- No Wireless Charging
- Higher Price
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a peak brightness of 1059 nits, noticeably brighter than the 12T Pro's 913 nits. Both feature excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. While both have AMOLED panels, the F5 Pro's higher brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a complex area. Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the 12T Pro often receives praise for its main sensor and image processing. The Poco F5 Pro's camera is still very good, but may not consistently match the 12T Pro's image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Both offer excellent video recording capabilities.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, ensuring flagship-level performance. However, the 12T Pro has slightly higher clock speeds on its CPU cores (X2, A710, and A510), potentially translating to a marginal performance advantage in demanding tasks. Real-world usage will likely feel very similar for most users.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro holds a slight advantage in battery endurance, boasting a 99h rating compared to the 12T Pro's 91h. However, the 12T Pro's 120W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. The Poco F5 Pro offers 67W wired and 30W wireless charging, which is still respectable but slower.
Buying Guide
The Poco F5 Pro is ideal for users who want a vibrant display, appreciate wireless charging, and are looking for a slightly more budget-friendly option. The Xiaomi 12T Pro is best suited for power users who prioritize incredibly fast charging speeds and a marginally more powerful processor, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.