Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Poco X4 GT: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X4 GT edges out the F4 thanks to its superior chipset and slightly better battery life. However, the F4 boasts a significantly brighter display, making it a strong choice for those prioritizing screen visibility. Ultimately, the X4 GT offers a more powerful overall package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F4 | Xiaomi Poco X4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 23 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 27 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | 22021211RG, 22021211RI | 22041216G, 22041216UG |
| Price | ₹ 16,999 | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 101h | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1190:1 |
| Loudspeaker | -26.1 LUFS (Good) | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 747871 (v9) GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Brighter Display (1003 nits)
- Proven Snapdragon 870 Chipset
- Fast 67W Charging
- Slightly lower battery life
- Older chipset compared to X4 GT
- Camera performance potentially slightly behind X4 GT
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- More Powerful Dimensity 8100 Chipset
- Better Battery Life (112h endurance)
- Fast 67W Charging
- Lower Display Brightness (600 nits)
- Design may be less appealing to some
- Camera processing may not be as refined
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1003 nits, significantly outperforming the X4 GT's 600 nits. While both offer a respectable contrast ratio, the F4's brightness advantage makes it easier to view in direct sunlight. The X4 GT's display is still good, but not as impressive.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature similar camera setups, but the X4 GT's more powerful chipset may allow for slightly better image processing. Real-world camera performance will likely be comparable, with both capable of capturing decent photos and videos in various conditions. Detailed camera testing would be needed to determine a clear winner.
Performance
The Poco X4 GT's MediaTek Dimensity 8100 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Poco F4's Snapdragon 870. The Dimensity 8100's architecture and newer manufacturing process (5nm vs 7nm) contribute to faster processing speeds and improved efficiency. Expect smoother multitasking and better gaming performance on the X4 GT.
Battery Life
The Poco X4 GT demonstrates slightly better battery endurance, boasting an endurance rating of 112 hours compared to the F4's 101 hours. While the difference isn't massive, it suggests the X4 GT's more efficient chipset contributes to longer battery life. Both phones support 67W fast charging, allowing for quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco F4 is ideal for users who prioritize a vibrant, bright display for media consumption and gaming, and appreciate a proven chipset. The Xiaomi Poco X4 GT is best suited for power users who demand top-tier performance for demanding games and applications, and value extended battery life.