The Xiaomi Poco series consistently delivers impressive value, but choosing between models can be tricky. Today, we're pitting the Poco F4 against the Poco X3 Pro to see which phone offers the best bang for your buck. We'll break down everything from display quality to performance and battery life.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 edges out the X3 Pro thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 870 chipset and brighter display. However, the X3 Pro boasts superior battery life and a slightly lower price point, making it a compelling option for budget-conscious users prioritizing longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 23 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 27 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | 22021211RG, 22021211RI | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | ₹ 16,999 | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 101h
|
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9)
GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Faster Snapdragon 870 Chipset
- Brighter Display (1003 nits)
- Faster Charging (67W)
- Sleeker Design (generally)
- Slightly shorter battery life than X3 Pro
- Potentially higher price
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Excellent Battery Life (112h endurance)
- Lower Price Point
- Reliable Performance
- Slower Snapdragon 860 Chipset
- Less Bright Display
- Slower Charging (33W)
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1003 nits, offering significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. Both phones have a nominal contrast ratio, but the F4's brightness advantage makes a noticeable difference. The X3 Pro's display is still good, but not as impressive.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Generally, the F4 is expected to have slightly better image processing and low-light performance due to the more modern chipset. Both offer standard photo and video capabilities.
Performance
The Poco F4's Snapdragon 870 is a clear winner here. It's a more powerful chipset than the X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860, resulting in faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. While the X3 Pro is still capable, the F4 offers a more premium experience.
Battery Life
The Poco X3 Pro shines in the battery department, boasting an endurance rating of 112 hours, slightly surpassing the F4's 101 hours. While both offer excellent battery life, the X3 Pro provides a bit more peace of mind for heavy users.
Buying Guide
The Poco F4 is ideal for gamers and power users who demand smooth performance and a vibrant display. The Poco X3 Pro is a great choice for those seeking exceptional battery life and a reliable all-around experience without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Poco F4 worth the extra money?
If performance and a brighter display are your priorities, the Poco F4 is worth the investment. However, if battery life and a lower price are more important, the X3 Pro remains a strong contender.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco F4 is the clear winner for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset. It will handle demanding games with ease.
