Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Poco F3: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 offers a brighter display and faster charging, while the F3 boasts slightly better battery endurance. Ultimately, the F4 is a worthwhile upgrade if display brightness and charging speed are priorities, but the F3 remains a compelling option for those prioritizing longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F4 | Xiaomi Poco F3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 23 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 27 | Available. Released 2021, March 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green | Arctic White, Night Black, Deep Ocean Blue, Moonlight Silver |
| Models | 22021211RG, 22021211RI | M2012K11AG |
| Price | ₹ 16,999 | € 162.15 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 101h | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.1 LUFS (Good) | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 631850 (v8), 697216 (v9) GeekBench: 3206 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Brighter Display (1003 nits)
- Faster 67W Charging
- Sleek Design (generally perceived)
- Slightly lower battery endurance than F3
- Camera specs not fully detailed
Xiaomi Poco F3
- Excellent Battery Life (114h endurance)
- Same Powerful Snapdragon 870 Chipset
- Competitive Price
- Slower 33W Charging
- Less Bright Display
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 takes a slight edge in the display department with a measured peak brightness of 1003 nits, significantly brighter than the F3. Both feature AMOLED panels with excellent contrast (Infinite nominal), but the F4's increased brightness makes it more usable outdoors. Both have a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, detailed camera specifications are missing. Based on general knowledge, the F4 likely features minor improvements in image processing and potentially a slightly upgraded sensor, but the overall camera experience should be quite similar. Both offer capable camera systems for their price range.
Performance
Both phones share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G chipset and CPU configuration, meaning performance will be virtually identical in everyday tasks and demanding games. You shouldn't notice a significant difference in speed or responsiveness between the two.
Battery Life
The Poco F3 holds a slight advantage in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 114 hours compared to the F4's 101 hours. However, the F4 compensates with significantly faster 67W wired charging (38 minutes to 100%) compared to the F3's 33W charging (52 minutes to 100%).
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco F4 is ideal for users who value a vibrant, bright display for media consumption and gaming, and appreciate faster charging. The Poco F3 is a great choice for users who prioritize maximum battery life and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds, offering excellent value for money.