Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Redmi K50 Gaming: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 GT edges out the Redmi K50 Gaming thanks to its superior display (likely AMOLED) and potentially better camera capabilities. While both offer blazing-fast 120W charging and the same core processor, the Poco's overall package feels slightly more refined for the price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 28 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow | Black, Gray, Blue, AMG |
| Models | 21121210G | 21121210C |
| Price | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 | About 460 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 81h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.4 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) | - |
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Likely AMOLED Display
- Potentially Better Camera
- Fast 120W Charging
- Aggressive Design
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Thermal Throttling Potential
- Software Updates May Be Slower
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
- Enhanced Cooling System
- Dedicated Gaming Features
- Fast 120W Charging
- Potentially More Customizable Gaming Software
- Likely LCD Display
- Camera May Be Less Versatile
- Design Focused Primarily on Gaming
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature high refresh rate displays (120Hz or higher). However, the Poco F4 GT is expected to have an AMOLED panel, offering superior contrast, color accuracy, and viewing angles compared to the Redmi K50 Gaming's likely LCD panel. This is a significant advantage for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
While both phones have 'Photo / Video' listed, the Poco F4 GT is generally expected to have a slightly better camera system. The Redmi K50 Gaming's camera is still capable, but the Poco often features a more versatile setup. Specific sensor details are needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
Performance is virtually identical. Both devices utilize the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset with the same CPU configuration. Real-world gaming performance will depend more on thermal management and software optimization, which could be a differentiating factor. The Redmi K50 Gaming is often known for its enhanced cooling solutions.
Battery Life
The endurance rating of 81h suggests exceptional battery life for both devices, indicating efficient power management. Charging speeds are identical at 120W, ensuring incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Poco F4 GT is ideal for gamers and users prioritizing a vibrant display and a well-rounded feature set. The Redmi K50 Gaming is a strong contender for those specifically seeking a dedicated gaming phone with advanced cooling and potentially more customizable gaming features, though it might compromise slightly on display quality.