Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro emerges as the winner thanks to its superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, brighter display, and longer battery life. While the F4 GT boasts incredibly fast 120W charging, the F5 Pro's overall improvements make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 28 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow | Black, White |
| Models | 21121210G | 23013PC75G |
| Price | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 81h | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.4 LUFS (Good) | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Aggressive gaming features (e.g., triggers)
- Competitive price
- Slightly older chipset
- Lower peak brightness display
- Shorter battery life compared to F5 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Improved Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Longer battery life
- Wireless charging support
- Slower charging speed compared to F4 GT
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro takes the lead here. While both offer excellent contrast (nominally infinite), the F5 Pro's measured peak brightness of 1059 nits is significantly higher than the F4 GT, resulting in better outdoor visibility and a more vibrant viewing experience. Both utilize AMOLED panels, ensuring rich colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two, as both feature similar camera setups. However, the F5 Pro's improved image processing capabilities, thanks to the newer chipset, may result in slightly better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Both offer capable photo and video recording.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro is a noticeable upgrade over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the F4 GT. While both CPUs share the same core configuration, the 8+ Gen 1 offers improved efficiency and slightly better sustained performance, especially during demanding tasks and gaming. Expect smoother multitasking and less thermal throttling on the F5 Pro.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro clearly wins in the battery department. Its endurance rating of 99 hours significantly surpasses the F4 GT's 81 hours. While the F4 GT's 120W charging is incredibly fast, the F5 Pro's larger battery and more efficient chipset provide longer overall usage time.
Buying Guide
The Poco F4 GT is a great option for gamers prioritizing blazing-fast charging and a powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. The Poco F5 Pro is ideal for users seeking a brighter, more efficient display, improved performance, and extended battery life, making it a better all-around choice.