Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Xiaomi 12: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 12 offers a more refined experience with faster wireless charging, a brighter display, and a generally more premium feel. However, the Poco F4 GT delivers incredible value with its significantly faster wired charging and aggressive pricing. It's a trade-off between premium features and raw performance/cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Xiaomi 12 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2021, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 28 | Available. Released 2021, December 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 152.7 x 69.9 x 8.2 mm (6.01 x 2.75 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 179 g or 180 g (6.31 oz) |
| Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@30/60fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e (market dependent), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 39 min 50W wireless, 100% in 53 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow | Gray, Blue, Purple, Green |
| Models | 21121210G | 2201123G, 2201123C |
| Price | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 | $ 284.99 / € 149.99 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.91 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 81h | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.4 LUFS (Good) | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) | AnTuTu: 985115 (v9) GeekBench: 3652 (v5.1) GFXBench: 75fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Excellent performance for the price
- Potentially better sustained performance due to cooling
- Aggressive pricing
- Less premium design
- Camera not as refined as Xiaomi 12
- Lower peak brightness display
Xiaomi 12
- Brighter display (896 nits)
- More refined camera system
- Wireless charging support
- Premium design and build quality
- Slower wired charging (67W)
- Higher price point
- Potentially less sustained performance under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 12 boasts a measured peak brightness of 896 nits, making it significantly easier to see outdoors compared to the Poco F4 GT. Both phones have a nominal infinite contrast ratio, but the Xiaomi 12's brightness advantage is noticeable. The Poco F4 GT's display is still good, but lacks the same outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
While both phones have 'Photo / Video' capabilities listed, the Xiaomi 12 generally offers a more versatile and refined camera system. It typically features a wider range of lenses and better image processing. The Poco F4 GT's camera is capable, but doesn't quite match the Xiaomi 12's overall quality. Expect better low-light performance and more natural colors from the Xiaomi 12.
Performance
Both phones share the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, so raw performance is largely comparable. However, the Poco F4 GT's cooling system is often touted as being more effective, potentially allowing for sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. Real-world usage will likely feel very similar for most tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones have an endurance rating of 81h/82h, suggesting similar battery life in typical usage. However, the Poco F4 GT's 120W wired charging is a game-changer, fully charging the phone in just 17 minutes. The Xiaomi 12's 67W wired charging takes considerably longer (39 minutes), and while it offers 50W wireless charging, it's still slower than the Poco F4 GT's wired speed.
Buying Guide
The Poco F4 GT is ideal for gamers and power users seeking maximum performance at a competitive price. If you prioritize a more polished design, wireless charging, and a slightly better camera experience, the Xiaomi 12 is the better choice. Consider your budget and usage habits carefully.