Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Xiaomi 11T Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 11T Pro edges out the Poco F4 GT thanks to its superior battery life and measured brightness. However, the F4 GT offers a slightly more powerful chipset and potentially better gaming performance. Ultimately, the 11T Pro provides a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Xiaomi 11T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 26 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 28 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 72% in 10 min, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | 21121210G | 2107113SG, 2107113SI, 2107113SR |
| Price | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 | € 139.00 / $ 185.21 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 39,999 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 81h | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.4 LUFS (Good) | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) | - |
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- 120W fast charging
- Aggressive gaming design
- Smooth 120Hz AMOLED display
- Potentially less efficient chipset
- Camera performance may be inconsistent
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Excellent battery life
- Bright 837 nits display
- Reliable camera performance
- Balanced overall experience
- Slightly less powerful chipset than F4 GT
- Charging speed slightly slower (72% in 10 min vs 100% in 17 min)
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 GT boasts a nominal 'infinite' contrast ratio, which is a marketing term. The Xiaomi 11T Pro, however, provides a measured peak brightness of 837 nits, offering significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. Both phones feature AMOLED displays with smooth 120Hz refresh rates, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. The 11T Pro's brightness gives it a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera setups, but specifics are missing in the provided data. Generally, the Xiaomi 11T Pro is known for its reliable image processing and consistent results across its lenses. The Poco F4 GT's camera is capable, but may not offer the same level of refinement. Further testing would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
The Poco F4 GT packs the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, a flagship chipset known for its raw power. The Xiaomi 11T Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 888 5G, still a very capable processor. While the 8 Gen 1 generally offers slightly better performance, the 888 5G is more efficient. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal for most users, but the F4 GT has a slight edge in demanding tasks like gaming.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 11T Pro takes a clear lead in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 92 hours compared to the Poco F4 GT's 81 hours. While both phones support 120W fast charging (with similar charging times), the 11T Pro's larger battery capacity provides significantly more usage time between charges.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize raw performance and fast charging. The Xiaomi 11T Pro is a better choice for those seeking longer battery life, a brighter display, and a more balanced overall experience.