Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Redmi Note 10 Pro (China): Which Xiaomi Phone Reigns Supreme?

Xiaomi disrupted the mid-range market with both the Poco F3 and the Redmi Note 10 Pro (China variant). While both aim for impressive value, they take different approaches. The Poco F3 prioritizes raw processing power with the Snapdragon 870, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro focuses on a balanced experience with the Dimensity 1100 and notably faster charging. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing gaming and sustained performance, the Xiaomi Poco F3 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 offers a significant performance edge. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) excels in charging speed and offers a compelling alternative for those who value convenience and a more balanced feature set.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi Poco F3 Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 -CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2021, March 222021, May 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, March 27Available. Released 2021, June 02
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in)163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight196 g (6.91 oz)193 g (6.81 oz)
 IP53, dust and splash resistantIP53, dust and splash resistant
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak)IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm)
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G77 MC9
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOSAndroid 11, MIUI 12.5
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesColor spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panoramaColor spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Triple48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), AF64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRPanorama, HDR
Single20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Video1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audio24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavICGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
 Virtual proximity sensingVirtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min
TypeLi-Po 4520 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsArctic White, Night Black, Deep Ocean Blue, Moonlight SilverStargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White
ModelsM2012K11AG-
Price€ 162.15About 200 EUR
SAR1.06 W/kg (head)     0.72 W/kg (body)-
SAR EU0.60 W/kg (head)     0.84 W/kg (body)-
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 114h -
Camera Photo / Video-
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)-
Loudspeaker -24.5 LUFS (Very good) -
Performance AnTuTu: 631850 (v8), 697216 (v9) GeekBench: 3206 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)-

Xiaomi Poco F3

  • Superior processing power with Snapdragon 870
  • Better sustained performance for gaming
  • Potentially more refined display calibration

  • Slower charging speed (33W)
  • Battery life not explicitly detailed

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)

  • Incredibly fast 67W charging (42 minutes)
  • Likely more versatile camera system
  • Balanced performance with Dimensity 1100

  • Less powerful processor than Snapdragon 870
  • Potential for more throttling under heavy load

Display Comparison

Both phones feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the Poco F3's flagship positioning, it likely benefits from a slightly more refined display calibration. The Redmi Note 10 Pro, while still good, may prioritize cost savings in this area. Without specific nit values, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Poco F3's overall positioning suggests a potential edge in display quality.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Given Xiaomi’s history, the Redmi Note 10 Pro likely features a higher megapixel count main sensor, potentially leveraging a 108MP or even a 200MP sensor (common in the Note series). However, sensor size and image processing algorithms are crucial. The Poco F3, positioned as a flagship killer, may prioritize image quality through software optimization and a larger sensor, even if the megapixel count is lower. Without detailed sensor specifications, it’s difficult to assess which phone delivers superior image quality, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro likely offers more versatility with its camera system.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F3’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is built on a smaller node than the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 1100 (6nm). While 6nm is still efficient, the 7nm process generally allows for higher clock speeds and better thermal management. The Snapdragon 870’s octa-core configuration (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585, 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) is geared towards sustained performance, while the Dimensity 1100 (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) prioritizes a balance of power and efficiency. This translates to the Poco F3 handling graphically intensive games with greater ease and less throttling over extended periods. The Dimensity 1100 is no slouch, but the Snapdragon 870 holds a clear advantage for demanding users.

Battery Life

The Poco F3 boasts an endurance rating of 114 hours, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s battery life is not specified. However, the charging speed is a major differentiator. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W wired charging, completing a full charge in 42 minutes, significantly outperforms the Poco F3’s 33W charging (52 minutes). While the Poco F3’s battery endurance suggests a decent capacity, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery life disadvantage, offering greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their device.

Buying Guide

Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 if you need uncompromising performance for demanding games and applications, and are willing to trade some charging speed for that power. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prefer a phone that charges incredibly quickly, offers a solid all-around experience, and doesn't necessarily require the absolute highest level of processing power.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1100 is a capable processor, but it's less efficient than the Snapdragon 870. While it won't necessarily overheat, you may experience more noticeable throttling after extended gaming sessions, leading to a slight drop in frame rates. The Poco F3's Snapdragon 870 is better equipped to maintain consistent performance over longer periods.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Poco F3 slow compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro's 67W?
Yes, 33W is considerably slower than 67W. The Redmi Note 10 Pro can fully charge in 42 minutes, while the Poco F3 takes 52 minutes. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery. However, the Poco F3's battery endurance rating suggests it may not require charging as often.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 10 Pro support high refresh rate gaming?
While not explicitly stated, the Dimensity 1100 is capable of supporting high refresh rate gaming. However, achieving consistently high frame rates will depend on the game's optimization and the phone's thermal management. The Poco F3, with its more powerful processor, is likely to deliver a smoother gaming experience at higher refresh rates.