Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Mi 11 Lite 5G: Which Xiaomi Phone Wins?

Xiaomi's mid-range offerings have consistently delivered impressive value, but choosing between the Poco F3 and the Mi 11 Lite 5G requires careful consideration. The Poco F3 prioritizes raw performance with its Snapdragon 870, while the Mi 11 Lite 5G focuses on a more balanced experience with a sleeker design and efficient Snapdragon 780G. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone best suits your needs.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the Poco F3 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 provides a significant performance advantage. However, the Mi 11 Lite 5G offers a more refined experience with a brighter display and lighter build, making it ideal for everyday use and content consumption.

PHONES
Phone Names	Xiaomi Poco F3	Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
	-	1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China

Launch
Announced	2021, March 22	2021, March 29
Status	Available. Released 2021, March 27	Available. Released 2021, April 16

Body
Build	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back
Dimensions	163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in)	160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	196 g (6.91 oz)	159 g (5.61 oz)
	IP53, dust and splash resistant	IP53, dust and splash resistant

Display
Protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass 6
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)
Size	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio)	6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak)	AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)	Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.90 GHz Kryo 670)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)	Qualcomm SM7350-AB Snapdragon 780G (5 nm)
GPU	Adreno 650	Adreno 642
OS	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14

Memory
Card slot	No	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM	64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2

Main Camera
Features	Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama	Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Single	20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm	20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Triple	48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), AF	64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	HDR	HDR, panorama
Single	20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm	20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Video	1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps	1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers	Yes, with dual speakers
	24-bit/192kHz audio	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.1, A2DP, LE	5.2, A2DP, LE
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes (market/region dependent)	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
	Virtual proximity sensing	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min	33W wired, PD3.0, QC4
Type	Li-Po 4520 mAh	Li-Po 4250 mAh

Misc
Colors	Arctic White, Night Black, Deep Ocean Blue, Moonlight Silver	Truffle Black, Mint Green, Citrus Yellow
Models	M2012K11AG	M2101K9G, M2101K9C, M2101K9R
Price	€ 162.15	About 120 EUR
SAR	1.06 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body)	1.03 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	0.60 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body)	0.56 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	Endurance rating 114h	Endurance rating 106h
Camera	Photo / Video	Photo / Video
Display	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-24.5 LUFS (Very good)	-23.6 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	AnTuTu: 631850 (v8), 697216 (v9) GeekBench: 3206 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)	AnTuTu: 465534 (v8) \| 522490 (v9) GeekBench: 2909 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Xiaomi Poco F3

Superior performance with Snapdragon 870
Slightly longer battery life
Faster charging speed

Potentially less refined design
May run warmer under heavy load

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

Brighter and more vibrant display
Lighter and more comfortable to hold
More efficient Snapdragon 780G

Noticeably lower performance
Shorter battery life

Display Comparison

The Mi 11 Lite 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 846 nits, compared to the Poco F3’s ‘Infinite’ (nominal) contrast ratio, which doesn’t specify peak brightness. This difference translates to better visibility outdoors. Both phones share an ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio, suggesting they utilize AMOLED panels, but the Mi 11 Lite 5G’s higher peak brightness provides a more vivid and enjoyable viewing experience, especially with HDR content. While both likely feature similar color accuracy, the brightness advantage is a key differentiator.

Camera Comparison

Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the context data lacks specifics. Given Xiaomi’s typical approach, the Poco F3 likely prioritizes overall camera versatility, while the Mi 11 Lite 5G may lean towards a more balanced, aesthetically pleasing image profile. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Poco F3’s stronger processing power could offer advantages in computational photography and video stabilization. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to be a significant selling point.

Performance

The Poco F3’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) chipset is the star here, offering a substantial performance leap over the Mi 11 Lite 5G’s Snapdragon 780G (5nm). The 870’s octa-core CPU, with its 3.2 GHz Kryo 585 prime core, significantly outperforms the 780G’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 670. The 7nm process node of the 870 is less efficient than the 5nm node of the 780G, but the sheer processing power of the 870 makes it the better choice for demanding applications. This translates to smoother gameplay, faster rendering times, and a more responsive user experience on the Poco F3.

Battery Life

The Poco F3 offers an endurance rating of 114 hours, slightly exceeding the Mi 11 Lite 5G’s 106 hours. Both support 33W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC standards, achieving a full charge in approximately 52 minutes for the Poco F3 and likely a similar timeframe for the Mi 11 Lite 5G. The Poco F3’s larger battery capacity, combined with its faster charging speed, gives it a slight edge in overall battery performance, despite the Snapdragon 870’s higher power consumption.

Buying Guide

Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and are willing to accept a slightly less premium design. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G if you prefer a lighter, more stylish phone with a vibrant display and excellent battery efficiency for everyday tasks and media consumption.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 780G in the Mi 11 Lite 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?

While the Snapdragon 780G is a capable chip, it will likely require lower graphics settings and potentially experience some frame drops in demanding titles like Genshin Impact. The Poco F3’s Snapdragon 870 offers a much smoother experience with higher settings and sustained performance.

❓ Does the Poco F3 get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?

The Snapdragon 870 can generate more heat than the 780G. While Xiaomi incorporates cooling solutions, prolonged gaming at maximum settings may lead to noticeable warming. However, thermal throttling is unlikely to be severe enough to significantly impact performance.

❓ Is the difference in display brightness between the two phones noticeable in everyday use?

Yes, the Mi 11 Lite 5G’s brighter display (846 nits) is particularly noticeable outdoors or in brightly lit environments. The Poco F3’s display may appear dimmer in comparison, requiring you to increase brightness levels, which can impact battery life.

❓ Which phone is better for watching videos and streaming content?

The Mi 11 Lite 5G’s brighter display and potentially more accurate color reproduction make it the better choice for video consumption. The increased brightness enhances the viewing experience, especially with HDR content.