Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Motorola Edge 20 Fusion: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F3 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset delivers significantly more processing power than the Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U. However, the Edge 20 Fusion offers a more balanced experience with respectable performance and a potentially smoother everyday experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F3 | Motorola Edge 20 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 22 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 27 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), AF | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Arctic White, Night Black, Deep Ocean Blue, Moonlight Silver | Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal |
| Models | M2012K11AG | - |
| Price | € 162.15 | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 1.06 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 114h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 631850 (v8), 697216 (v9) GeekBench: 3206 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Poco F3
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 870
- Faster 33W charging with Quick Charge support
- Higher endurance rating suggests better battery life
- Camera specs are unknown, potential for lower image quality
- Software experience may be less refined than Motorola
Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- Potentially more efficient Dimensity 800U chipset
- Clean Motorola software experience
- Competitive price point
- Significantly lower performance compared to Snapdragon 870
- Slower 30W charging
- Battery life is unknown
Display Comparison
Both devices share a similar 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels typical of AMOLED panels. However, detailed display specifications like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the Poco F3’s positioning, it likely targets higher peak brightness for HDR content. The Edge 20 Fusion, while offering a good viewing experience, may fall slightly behind in vibrancy. The absence of refresh rate data is a key omission; assuming both are 120Hz, the Poco F3’s potentially brighter panel would be more impactful for HDR video.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. Given the Poco F3’s focus on value, it likely prioritizes a larger main sensor for better low-light performance. The Edge 20 Fusion may emphasize software processing for image enhancement. Without knowing megapixel counts or aperture values, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The absence of OIS information is also critical; its presence on either device would significantly improve video stabilization and low-light photography. We can assume both phones include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but details are lacking.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Poco F3’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a significant step up from the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7nm). The Snapdragon 870’s octa-core CPU, with its 3.2 GHz Kryo 585 prime core, provides substantially more processing power than the Edge 20 Fusion’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. While both are 7nm chips, the Snapdragon 870’s architecture and higher clock speeds deliver a noticeable advantage. The Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U is still capable, but will struggle with demanding titles at maximum settings.
Battery Life
The Poco F3 boasts an endurance rating of 114 hours, while the Edge 20 Fusion’s battery life is not specified. The Poco F3’s 33W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support allows for a full charge in 52 minutes, offering faster replenishment than the Edge 20 Fusion’s 30W charging. While a larger battery capacity isn’t guaranteed, the Poco F3’s faster charging and higher endurance rating suggest it will require less frequent top-ups, despite potentially having similar battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, demanding applications, or future-proofing. Its Snapdragon 870 provides a substantial performance advantage. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you prioritize a balanced experience with good battery life and a more streamlined software experience, and aren't pushing the phone to its absolute limits with intensive tasks.