Xiaomi consistently delivers impressive smartphones at competitive prices. The Poco F3 GT and Redmi K40 Gaming are two such contenders, both boasting powerful performance and attractive features. But which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
Both phones offer excellent performance thanks to the Dimensity 1200 chipset and 67W charging. The Redmi K40 Gaming edges out the F3 GT with its enhanced cooling system and gaming-specific features, making it the slightly better choice for serious mobile gamers, while the F3 GT offers a more versatile experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 23 | 2021, April 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 26 | Available. Released 2021, April 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5065 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver | Black, Gray, Silver, Bruce Lee Yellow |
| Models | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I | M2012K10C, M2104K10AC |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Excellent value for money
- Fast 67W charging
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Good overall performance
- Cooling system could be better
- Camera slightly less impressive than K40 Gaming
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming
- Superior cooling system for sustained gaming
- Slightly better camera performance
- Potentially better display calibration
- Gaming-focused design
- Design might be less appealing to some
- Potentially slightly higher price
Display Comparison
Both devices feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth visuals and vibrant colors. However, the Redmi K40 Gaming often has slightly better color accuracy and brightness calibration. The F3 GT might have a marginally more comfortable grip due to its design.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi K40 Gaming generally has a slightly more versatile camera system, often featuring a higher resolution primary sensor and improved image processing algorithms. Both phones offer decent camera performance in good lighting conditions, but the Redmi K40 Gaming tends to produce more detailed and vibrant images. Both have a 13MP front camera.
Performance
Performance is largely identical thanks to the shared Dimensity 1200 chipset. However, the Redmi K40 Gaming typically incorporates a more robust vapor chamber cooling system, allowing it to maintain peak performance for longer durations during intensive gaming sessions. The F3 GT might experience slight thermal throttling under prolonged heavy load.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery and support 67W fast charging, achieving a full charge in approximately 42 minutes. Battery life is comparable in real-world usage, offering a full day of moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Poco F3 GT is ideal for users seeking a well-rounded smartphone with strong performance, a vibrant display, and fast charging. It's a great option for everyday use and light gaming. The Redmi K40 Gaming is tailored for hardcore mobile gamers who prioritize sustained performance, advanced cooling, and gaming-centric features like shoulder triggers (though these are not present in all regions).
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are the Poco F3 GT and Redmi K40 Gaming the same phone?
No, while they share the same chipset and charging speed, the Redmi K40 Gaming focuses more on gaming features and cooling, while the Poco F3 GT offers a more balanced experience.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Redmi K40 Gaming is generally better for intensive gaming due to its superior cooling system, which helps prevent thermal throttling.
