The Xiaomi Poco series consistently delivers impressive value, but choosing between models can be tricky. Today, we're pitting the Poco F3 GT against the Poco X3 Pro to determine which phone offers the best overall experience. We'll break down everything from performance and display to camera and battery life.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F3 GT takes the crown for raw performance thanks to its Dimensity 1200 chipset and faster charging. However, the Poco X3 Pro boasts exceptional battery life and a slightly more refined display. Ultimately, the F3 GT is for gamers and power users, while the X3 Pro is ideal for those prioritizing longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 23 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 26 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5065 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Faster Performance (Dimensity 1200)
- 67W Fast Charging
- Brighter Display
- Sleek Design
- Shorter Battery Life
- Camera Not Exceptional
- Can get warm under heavy load
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Exceptional Battery Life
- Good Value for Money
- Versatile Camera
- Solid Build Quality
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Less Powerful Processor
- Display slightly less vibrant
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 120Hz AMOLED display with a 1401:1 contrast ratio, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The X3 Pro's display might have slightly better color accuracy, but the difference is minimal. The F3 GT's display is generally considered brighter.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but neither excels. The Poco X3 Pro's camera is slightly more versatile, offering a wider range of shooting modes. The F3 GT's camera is generally considered to produce slightly more vibrant images, but both struggle in low-light conditions. Video recording is comparable on both devices.
Performance
The Poco F3 GT's Mediatek Dimensity 1200 significantly outperforms the Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860. Expect smoother gameplay, faster app loading times, and better multitasking on the F3 GT. The Dimensity 1200's GPU also provides a noticeable edge in graphics-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Poco X3 Pro's battery life is a standout feature, consistently delivering exceptional endurance. The F3 GT's battery is decent, but it doesn't match the X3 Pro's longevity. The X3 Pro's slower charging speed is a trade-off for its superior battery performance.
Buying Guide
The Poco F3 GT is perfect for gamers, content creators, and anyone who demands top-tier performance. If you prioritize long battery life, a balanced experience, and don't need the absolute fastest processor, the Poco X3 Pro is a solid choice.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco F3 GT is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset and superior GPU.
❓ Is the Poco X3 Pro's battery life really that good?
Yes, the Poco X3 Pro is known for its exceptional battery life, often lasting well over a day with moderate usage.
❓ Which phone has better speakers?
The Poco F3 GT generally has louder and clearer speakers than the Poco X3 Pro.
❓ Which phone is more durable?
Both phones use plastic builds, but the X3 Pro feels slightly more robust and well-built.