The Xiaomi Poco series consistently delivers impressive specs at competitive prices. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the Poco F3 GT and the Poco F4 GT. Both offer gaming-focused features, but which one truly comes out on top?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 GT is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset, a blistering 120W charging speed, and a generally improved overall experience. While the F3 GT remains a capable device, the F4 GT's upgrades justify its price premium for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 23 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 26 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5065 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I | 21121210G |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 81h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 952124 (v9)
GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Excellent value for money
- Solid performance for the price
- Fast 67W charging
- Good display
- Older chipset
- Slower charging compared to F4 GT
- Camera could be better
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 performance
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Improved camera capabilities
- Premium design
- Higher price
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth visuals. The F4 GT might have slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to newer panel technology, but the difference is subtle. Both offer excellent viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
While both offer capable camera systems, the F4 GT likely has a slight edge in image processing and low-light performance thanks to the newer Snapdragon chip. Both phones are primarily focused on video recording, offering 4K capabilities. Detailed camera comparisons would require more in-depth testing.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the F4 GT is a substantial upgrade over the Dimensity 1200 in the F3 GT. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother gameplay, and better multitasking on the F4 GT. The F3 GT is still capable, but the F4 GT is in a different league for demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The F4 GT's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. While the F3 GT's 67W charging is still respectable, the F4 GT's charging speed is unmatched. Both phones offer similar battery capacity, and endurance ratings suggest comparable battery life in typical usage (around 81h).
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT? It's a great option for budget-conscious gamers and users who prioritize a solid all-around experience without breaking the bank. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT? If you demand top-tier performance, incredibly fast charging, and the latest features, the F4 GT is the way to go, especially for mobile gaming enthusiasts.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Poco F4 GT worth the extra money over the F3 GT?
If you prioritize performance and charging speed, the F4 GT is definitely worth the upgrade. However, if you're on a tighter budget and don't need the absolute best, the F3 GT remains a compelling option.
❓ Does the Poco F4 GT get hot during gaming?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can be prone to thermal throttling under sustained load. The F4 GT has improved cooling compared to some other phones with this chipset, but it's still something to be aware of.
