The Xiaomi Poco series consistently delivers impressive specs at competitive prices. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the Poco F3 GT and the Poco F4. Both offer a lot for the money, but which one comes out on top?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 edges out the F3 GT thanks to its Snapdragon 870 chipset, brighter display, and slightly faster charging. While the F3 GT remains a solid choice, the F4 provides a noticeable performance and feature upgrade, justifying its slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 23 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 26 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5065 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 300 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| SAR | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9)
GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Excellent value for money
- Good gaming performance (Dimensity 1200)
- Fast 67W charging
- Stylish design
- Slightly older chipset
- Lower peak brightness display
- Image processing not as refined as F4
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Slightly faster charging
- Improved image processing
- Slightly higher price
- Design is more understated
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 boasts a significant advantage with its measured 1003 nits peak brightness, making it much easier to see in direct sunlight. While the F3 GT's display is perfectly adequate, the F4's contrast ratio (nominally infinite) and higher brightness offer a superior viewing experience. Both feature AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Poco F4 likely has a slight edge in image processing and overall quality. While specific camera specs aren't detailed, the Snapdragon 870's image signal processor (ISP) generally provides better results. Expect improved dynamic range and low-light performance on the F4. Both offer decent video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4 is a clear winner here. It offers noticeably better CPU and GPU performance compared to the Dimensity 1200 in the F3 GT. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance, especially in demanding titles. The 7nm process of the 870 also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Poco F4 achieving an endurance rating of 101 hours. The F4 also charges slightly faster, completing a full charge in 38 minutes compared to the F3 GT's 42 minutes. Both utilize 67W wired charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT? Gamers on a tighter budget will appreciate the Dimensity 1200 and its focus on gaming features. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F4? Users prioritizing a smoother overall experience, a brighter display for outdoor use, and slightly faster charging will find the F4 a better fit.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Poco F4 worth the extra money over the F3 GT?
If you prioritize performance, a brighter display, and slightly faster charging, then the Poco F4 is worth the upgrade. However, if you're on a strict budget and primarily game, the F3 GT remains a compelling option.
❓ What is the difference between the Dimensity 1200 and Snapdragon 870?
The Snapdragon 870 generally offers better overall performance and efficiency due to its more advanced architecture and 7nm process. The Dimensity 1200 is still a capable chipset, but the 870 provides a noticeable boost, especially in demanding tasks.
