Xiaomi Poco C85 4G vs. Redmi 13C 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Xiaomi Poco C85 4G emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 77:49h battery endurance and capable Helio G81 chipset provide a reliable experience, while the Redmi 13C 5G's 5G is offset by slower charging and a less mature chipset.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco C85 4G | Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 01 | 2023, December 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 01 | Available. Released 2023, December 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.6 x 79.5 x 8 mm (6.76 x 3.13 x 0.31 in) | 168.1 x 77.9 x 8.2 mm (6.62 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 192 g or 195 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~254 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 114.9 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 660 nits (typ), 810 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 31 min 10W reverse wired | 18W wired, PD |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Purple, Black, Green | Starry Black, Twilight Blue, Starry Silver, Starlight Black, Startrail Green, Startrail Silver |
| Models | 25078PC3EE | 23124RN87G, 23124RN87I, 23124RN87C |
| Price | € 93.00 / $ 127.50 / £ 74.90 | $ 198.99 / £ 119.00 / € 116.99 / ₹ 10,895 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 77:49h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco C85 4G
- Exceptional battery life (77:49h endurance)
- Faster 33W charging with PD
- Proven and stable Helio G81 chipset
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Older chipset architecture
Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More modern Dimensity 6100+ chipset
- Potentially better image processing
- Slower 18W charging
- Shorter battery life compared to Poco C85
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, the focus here is on performance. The absence of high refresh rates on both suggests a focus on power efficiency. The Redmi 13C 5G's newer chipset *could* potentially support more advanced display features in future iterations, but currently, the display experience is likely comparable.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price points, both phones likely feature similar primary camera sensors. The Redmi 13C 5G *may* benefit from slightly improved image signal processing (ISP) capabilities within the Dimensity 6100+ chipset, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi 13C 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Poco C85 4G’s Helio G81 Ultra (12nm). The Dimensity 6100+ utilizes more efficient Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, compared to the Poco’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to a noticeable performance advantage for the Redmi 13C 5G in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. However, the Helio G81 is a well-established chipset known for its stability and optimization, and its 12nm process isn't necessarily a detriment for everyday tasks. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 6100+ will offer better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Poco C85 4G dominates in battery endurance with a remarkable 77:49h rating. This is significantly higher than what's typically seen in this price bracket. The Redmi 13C 5G, while likely offering respectable battery life, cannot compete with this figure. Furthermore, the Poco C85 4G’s 33W charging with PD support (50% in 31 minutes) is considerably faster than the Redmi 13C 5G’s 18W charging. The Poco also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Redmi 13C 5G, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco C85 4G if you need a phone that will reliably last through a full day (and then some) of heavy use, and you don't require 5G connectivity. It's ideal for users who prioritize battery life and a stable, proven processor. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G if you absolutely need 5G access for your network and are willing to trade some battery life and charging speed for future-proofing and a slightly more powerful CPU.