Poco C85 vs Poco M6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Xiaomi's 4G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Poco M6 Pro 4G emerges as the superior choice. Its significantly faster Helio G99 Ultra chipset and brighter 1053-nit display justify the price difference, offering a smoother and more enjoyable user experience. However, the C85's exceptional battery endurance is a strong counterpoint for those prioritizing longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco C85 4G | Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 01 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 01 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 171.6 x 79.5 x 8 mm (6.76 x 3.13 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 8 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~254 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 114.9 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 660 nits (typ), 810 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, MIUI 14, planned upgrade to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 31 min 10W reverse wired | 67W wired, 100% in 44 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Purple, Black, Green | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Models | 25078PC3EE | 2312FPCA6G |
| Price | € 93.00 / $ 127.50 / £ 74.90 | $ 170.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 77:49h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco C85 4G
- Exceptional battery life (77:49h endurance)
- 33W fast charging with PD support
- 10W reverse wired charging
- Less powerful Helio G81 Ultra chipset
- Likely lower display brightness and quality
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G
- Faster Helio G99 Ultra chipset for improved performance
- Brighter 1053-nit display for better outdoor visibility
- 67W ultra-fast charging (100% in 44 minutes)
- Shorter battery life compared to the C85
- No reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
The Poco M6 Pro 4G boasts a substantial advantage in display quality, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1053 nits. This is a significant leap over what we'd expect in the C85's price bracket, translating to excellent visibility outdoors. While the C85’s display specs are not provided, the M6 Pro’s brightness makes it far more usable in direct sunlight. The M6 Pro’s panel likely utilizes a higher contrast ratio as well, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are likely to feature similar camera setups focused on affordability. However, without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. We can assume the M6 Pro benefits from the more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Helio G99 Ultra, potentially leading to better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. The C85’s camera is likely adequate for casual snapshots, but the M6 Pro should offer a more refined photographic experience. We anticipate both phones will include a 2MP macro lens, which offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Poco C85 4G utilizes the Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, while the M6 Pro 4G steps up to the Helio G99 Ultra. The G99 Ultra, built on a more efficient process, features a faster CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores versus the C85’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores – resulting in noticeably snappier performance in everyday tasks and gaming. The M6 Pro’s CPU architecture is a generation newer, offering improved instructions per clock cycle. While both phones share 4GB of RAM (assumed based on market segment), the G99 Ultra’s superior GPU will deliver a better gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Poco C85 4G shines in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 77:49h score. This suggests a large battery capacity and efficient power management. The M6 Pro 4G, with an active use score of 11:46h, still provides respectable battery life, but falls short of the C85. However, the M6 Pro compensates with significantly faster 67W wired charging, reaching 100% in just 44 minutes, compared to the C85’s 33W charging which takes 31 minutes to reach 50%. The C85 also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the M6 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco C85 4G if you prioritize all-day battery life and are comfortable with a more basic user experience. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse, message, and make calls. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G if you value a more responsive experience, a brighter and more vibrant display, and faster charging – making it better suited for media consumption and light gaming.