Xiaomi Poco C75 vs. OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a more efficient processor, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G, built on a 6nm process, offers superior performance and power efficiency compared to the Poco C75’s Helio G81, and the 67W charging is a game-changer.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco C75 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 26 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 05 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2 mm (6.77 x 3.06 x 0.32 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD | 67W wired, 80% in 30 min |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray |
| Models | 2410FPCC5G | CPH2467, CPH2465 |
| Price | $ 134.99 / € 135.00 / £ 94.99 | £ 169.98 / € 209.99 |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco C75
- Potentially lower price point
- May offer slightly longer battery life due to potentially larger capacity (unconfirmed)
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Less powerful processor
- Slower charging speed
- Potential for thermal throttling during demanding tasks
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 695 5G processor
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Better multitasking and gaming performance
- Likely a higher price tag
- May have slightly shorter battery life compared to Poco C75 (depending on capacity)
- OnePlus's OxygenOS can be polarizing for some users
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood. While specific display specs are missing, the Poco C75’s Helio G81 suggests a focus on cost reduction, potentially impacting color accuracy and brightness. The Nord CE 3 Lite, benefiting from a more modern chipset, *may* have a slightly better display controller, but the real-world difference will likely be minimal. Bezels are expected to be comparable, and neither phone is expected to offer high refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. However, the chipset plays a role. The Snapdragon 695 includes a more advanced ISP (Image Signal Processor) than the Helio G81, potentially leading to better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and depth/macro sensors; however, the quality of the primary sensor will be the deciding factor. We anticipate the Nord CE 3 Lite will offer a more consistent and refined camera experience due to the superior processing capabilities of its chipset. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests limited utility for detailed close-up photography.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) is a clear upgrade over the Xiaomi Poco C75’s MediaTek Helio G81 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to significantly better power efficiency and thermal management, meaning the Nord CE 3 Lite will sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, also offer a performance advantage over the Helio G81’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This difference will be noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Nord CE 3 Lite will likely handle multitasking and app switching more smoothly.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s 67W charging is a standout feature. Achieving 80% charge in just 30 minutes is a significant advantage over the Poco C75’s 18W charging. While the Poco C75 might have a slightly larger battery capacity (spec not provided), the Nord CE 3 Lite’s faster charging effectively mitigates any capacity difference. Users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their phone will greatly benefit from the Nord CE 3 Lite’s charging speed. The Snapdragon 695’s efficiency also contributes to better overall battery life, even with similar capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco C75 if you need a phone primarily for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and you value a lower upfront cost above all else. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for multitasking, gaming, and content consumption, and you appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast charging.