Poco C75 vs. Moto G84: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smoother overall experience and faster charging, the Motorola Moto G84 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, coupled with 30W charging, offers a noticeable advantage over the Poco C75’s Helio G81 and 18W charging, despite the Poco’s lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco C75 | Motorola Moto G84 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - LATAM |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - LATAM |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 26, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - LATAM |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 26 | 2023, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 05 | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2 mm (6.77 x 3.06 x 0.32 in) | 160 x 74.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 166.8 g (5.86 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD | 30W wired |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta |
| Models | 2410FPCC5G | XT2347, XT2347-1, XT2347-2 |
| Price | $ 134.99 / € 135.00 / £ 94.99 | $ 399.00 / £ 189.99 / € 169.00 |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco C75
- Lowest possible price point
- 5G connectivity
- Acceptable for basic tasks
- Less powerful processor
- Slower charging speed
- Likely dimmer display
Motorola Moto G84
- Faster Snapdragon 695 processor
- 30W fast charging
- Brighter, more visible display
- Higher price than Poco C75
- Camera details are limited
- May not be ideal for intensive gaming
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G84 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 996 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for budget phones. While the Poco C75’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to be considerably dimmer. The Moto G84’s brightness level suggests a more modern panel technology, potentially improving color accuracy and viewing angles. The lack of information on the Poco C75’s panel type makes a direct comparison difficult, but the G84’s brightness alone is a substantial win.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, but detailed sensor information is limited. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization (OIS), it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Moto G84’s brand reputation suggests a more refined image processing pipeline. The prevalence of low-quality 2MP macro lenses on budget phones suggests avoiding reliance on those sensors on either device. The Snapdragon 695’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also likely more capable than the Helio G81’s, potentially leading to better image quality in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The chipset is where the most significant difference lies. The Motorola Moto G84 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Poco C75 is equipped with the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra (12nm). The Snapdragon 695, built on a smaller 6nm process, offers superior power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 12nm Helio G81. This translates to less throttling during sustained tasks and potentially longer battery life. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, also provide a performance edge over the Helio G81’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural advantages of the Snapdragon 695 are clear.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G84 shines in battery charging, offering 30W wired charging with PD support, compared to the Poco C75’s slower 18W charging. While the Poco C75’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Moto G84’s endurance rating of 117 hours and active use score of 12:31h demonstrate strong battery life. The faster charging speed on the Moto G84 significantly reduces downtime, allowing for quicker top-ups. The efficiency gains from the Snapdragon 695 also contribute to the Moto G84’s impressive battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco C75 if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and are willing to compromise on performance and charging speed. It’s a viable option for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Motorola Moto G84 if you value a more responsive user experience, faster charging, and a brighter, more usable display, even if it means spending a bit more upfront. It’s better suited for users who enjoy media consumption and occasional gaming.