The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Xiaomi Poco C75 and Infinix Note 40 Pro both aim to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they take drastically different approaches. The Poco C75 relies on a familiar Mediatek Helio G81, while the Note 40 Pro leaps forward with the more modern Dimensity 7020. This comparison dissects these key differences to determine which device offers the best blend of performance, features, and value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Infinix Note 40 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7020 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Poco C75’s Helio G81, coupled with substantially faster 45W charging and the convenience of wireless MagCharge. While the Poco C75 is a capable device, the Note 40 Pro offers a more refined experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 26 | 2024, March 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 05 | Available. Released 2024, March 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2 mm (6.77 x 3.06 x 0.32 in) | 164.3 x 74.5 x 8.1 mm (6.47 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 190 g or 196 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 14, XOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | Unspecified |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP, f/2.4
2 MP, f/2.4 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD | 45W wired, 50% in 26 min
20W wireless MagCharge
Reverse wired
Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold | Vintage Green, Titan Gold, Racing Edition |
| Models | 2410FPCC5G | X6851 |
| Price | $ 134.99 / € 135.00 / £ 94.99 | About 280 EUR |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco C75
- More affordable price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Significantly slower performance
- Slow 18W charging
- Lacks modern features like wireless charging
Infinix Note 40 Pro
- Faster and more efficient Dimensity 7020 chipset
- 45W fast charging and 20W wireless MagCharge
- Reverse charging capabilities
- Slightly higher price
- May still lack premium features found in higher-end phones
- Software experience can be inconsistent
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. Both likely utilize LCD panels given the price point. The more powerful Dimensity 7020 in the Note 40 Pro *could* enable more efficient display scaling and potentially smoother animations, even if the raw panel specs are similar. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the main sensors, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Dimensity 7020’s integrated image signal processor (ISP) in the Note 40 Pro is more advanced than the G81’s, potentially leading to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization, where the Note 40 Pro’s superior processing power could again provide an edge. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both phones suggests they are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Infinix Note 40 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Poco C75’s Helio G81 (12nm). The Dimensity 7020 features newer Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, compared to the G81’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to a noticeable improvement in CPU-intensive tasks and a more responsive user experience. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the Note 40 Pro’s chipset will handle memory management more effectively.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 40 Pro’s 45W wired charging is a game-changer, claiming a 50% charge in just 26 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Poco C75’s 18W charging. Furthermore, the Note 40 Pro adds 20W wireless MagCharge and reverse wired/wireless charging, offering unparalleled versatility. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging and wireless capabilities of the Note 40 Pro offset any potential difference in mAh size, providing a more convenient and flexible charging experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco C75 if you need a basic, reliable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are on a very tight budget. You’ll appreciate its simplicity and affordability. Buy the Infinix Note 40 Pro if you prioritize smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and quicker charging, and value the added convenience of wireless charging and reverse charging capabilities. It’s the better choice for users who consume more media or occasionally game.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7020 in the Infinix Note 40 Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7020’s 6nm process is more efficient than the Helio G81’s 12nm process, meaning it generates less heat under load. While some warming is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the Note 40 Pro is less likely to experience significant throttling compared to the Poco C75.
❓ Is the MagCharge feature on the Infinix Note 40 Pro compatible with all wireless chargers?
The Infinix Note 40 Pro utilizes the MagCharge standard, which is based on the Qi wireless charging protocol but adds magnetic alignment. It's compatible with standard Qi wireless chargers, but you'll get the full magnetic alignment benefit with MagCharge-compatible accessories.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Infinix Note 40 Pro compared to the Poco C75 in real-world use?
The Infinix Note 40 Pro’s 45W charging can take a phone from 0% to 50% in approximately 26 minutes, while the Poco C75’s 18W charging will take considerably longer – likely over an hour to reach the same level. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
