The Xiaomi Poco C75 5G and vivo Y75 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$200 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a modern smartphone experience without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with different chipsets and design philosophies. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Poco C75 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 4s Gen 2, built on a more efficient 4nm process, provides a noticeable advantage in CPU and potentially GPU performance, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming experiences compared to the vivo Y75 5G’s Dimensity 700.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 17 | 2022, January 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 20 | Available. Released 2022, January 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2 mm (6.77 x 3.06 x 0.32 in) | 164 x 75.9 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212.4 g (7.51 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4635 Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 611 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide)
Auxiliary lens | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aqua Bliss, Enchanted Green, Silver Stardust | Glowing Galaxy, Starlight Black |
| Models | MZB0IDJIN | V2142 |
| Price | ₹ 7,499 | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco C75 5G
- More efficient Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 chipset
- Modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A78)
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Likely better power efficiency
- May have slightly lower peak CPU clock speed
- Display specs are unknown
vivo Y75 5G
- Higher peak CPU clock speed (2.2 GHz)
- Vivo's reputation for camera software
- Potentially optimized image processing
- Established brand recognition
- Less efficient Dimensity 700 chipset (7nm)
- Older CPU architecture (Cortex-A76)
- Potential for more throttling under load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. The key difference lies under the hood: display driver efficiency. While specific display specs are unavailable, the Snapdragon 4s Gen 2’s integrated display engine may offer better power management for the Poco C75 5G’s screen, potentially leading to slightly longer battery life during video playback. Bezels are expected to be similar on both, and color accuracy will likely be standard for the price point.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a primary camera paired with depth and macro sensors. The image processing capabilities of vivo are generally well-regarded, potentially giving the Y75 5G an edge in producing visually appealing photos in good lighting conditions. However, the Snapdragon 4s Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more modern, potentially offering better noise reduction and dynamic range in challenging lighting scenarios. The usefulness of the 2MP macro cameras on both devices is questionable; they are primarily included for marketing purposes.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Xiaomi Poco C75 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 (4nm) utilizes a more modern architecture than the vivo Y75 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Snapdragon features Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, offering a performance edge over the Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. While the Dimensity 700 has a higher peak clock speed, the Snapdragon’s newer architecture and smaller process node translate to better efficiency and sustained performance. This means less throttling during extended gaming sessions and smoother multitasking. The 4nm process also implies lower heat generation, further aiding sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 18W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds – approximately 2-3 hours for a full charge. The actual battery life will depend on usage patterns and display settings. While the battery capacity isn't specified, the Snapdragon 4s Gen 2’s superior power efficiency gives the Poco C75 5G an advantage in overall battery endurance. The 4nm process allows it to accomplish more per watt, meaning you’ll likely get more screen-on time with the Poco C75 5G compared to the vivo Y75 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco C75 5G if you need a phone that can handle demanding apps and light gaming without significant slowdown, and if you value a more modern chipset architecture for potential software updates. Buy the vivo Y75 5G if you prioritize a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed for burst performance and prefer a brand known for its camera software optimizations, even if it means sacrificing some long-term efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 in the Poco C75 5G handle popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with playable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, the 4nm process and Cortex-A78 cores provide sufficient power for enjoyable gaming sessions. Expect some frame drops during intense action, but the overall experience should be smooth enough for casual gaming.
❓ Does the vivo Y75 5G support VoWiFi (Wi-Fi Calling) and VoLTE (Voice over LTE)?
Support for VoWiFi and VoLTE varies by carrier and region. It's crucial to check with your mobile carrier to confirm compatibility with the vivo Y75 5G before purchasing. While the Dimensity 700 chipset supports these technologies, their activation depends on carrier implementation.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Poco C75 5G and the vivo Y75 5G?
The Poco C75 5G runs Xiaomi's MIUI, known for its extensive customization options and feature set, but also criticized for occasional bloatware. The vivo Y75 5G utilizes Funtouch OS, which is generally considered cleaner and more streamlined, but offers fewer customization options. Both interfaces are based on Android, but the user experience will differ significantly.
