Poco C71 vs Redmi 13C 5G: A Deep Dive into Xiaomi's Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Poco C71’s Unisoc T7250, justifying the slight price premium. The 18W charging with PD support is also a significant benefit.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco C71 | Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 04 | 2023, December 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 08 | Available. Released 2023, December 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.8 x 77.8 x 8.3 mm (6.76 x 3.06 x 0.33 in) | 168.1 x 77.9 x 8.2 mm (6.62 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 192 g or 195 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 or Android 15 (Go edition), up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.8, (wide) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 18W wired, PD |
| Type | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Power Black, Cool Blue, Desert Gold | Starry Black, Twilight Blue, Starry Silver, Starlight Black, Startrail Green, Startrail Silver |
| Models | 25028PC03I, 25028PC03G | 23124RN87G, 23124RN87I, 23124RN87C |
| Price | £ 59.98 / € 76.41 / ₹ 6,199 | $ 198.99 / £ 119.00 / € 116.99 / ₹ 10,895 |
| SAR | 0.82 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Poco C71
- Potentially lower price point
- Streamlined software experience
- Acceptable for basic tasks
- Less powerful Unisoc T7250 chipset
- Slower 15W charging
- Limited gaming performance
Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G
- More powerful MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ chipset
- Faster 18W charging with PD
- Better multitasking and gaming performance
- Slightly higher price
- May have more pre-installed bloatware
- Potentially slightly lower battery life under heavy load (offset by efficiency)
Display Comparison
Neither Xiaomi provides display specifications beyond resolution. However, given the price points, both likely utilize LCD panels. The key difference lies in the underlying performance of the chipsets driving them. A more powerful chipset, like the Dimensity 6100+ in the Redmi 13C 5G, can contribute to smoother scrolling and faster app loading, enhancing the perceived display experience. Bezels are expected to be similar on both devices, reflecting their budget positioning.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, both phones likely feature a primary camera paired with depth and macro sensors. Given Xiaomi’s typical approach, the Redmi 13C 5G may benefit from slightly more sophisticated image processing algorithms due to its more powerful chipset. The Unisoc T7250 in the Poco C71 may struggle with complex image processing tasks, potentially resulting in softer images or slower processing times. The 2MP macro cameras on both devices are likely to offer limited utility.
Performance
The core differentiator here is the chipset. The Redmi 13C 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm) boasts a significant architectural advantage over the Poco C71’s Unisoc T7250 (12nm). The Dimensity 6100+ uses Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, compared to the C71’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.8 GHz. This translates to approximately 20-25% faster CPU performance in benchmarks, and a more substantial improvement in GPU performance. The 6nm process also means better power efficiency, leading to potentially longer battery life under load. The Redmi 13C 5G is the clear winner for users who value responsiveness and gaming.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the Redmi 13C 5G’s 18W charging with Power Delivery (PD) support offers a significant advantage over the Poco C71’s 15W charging. PD allows for faster and more efficient charging with compatible chargers. This means the Redmi 13C 5G can reach a full charge quicker, minimizing downtime. The more efficient Dimensity 6100+ chipset may also contribute to slightly better battery life during typical usage, offsetting any potential capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco C71 if you prioritize a minimal software experience and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G if you want a more responsive device capable of handling moderate multitasking, occasional gaming, and benefit from faster charging speeds and 5G connectivity.