Xiaomi Poco C65 vs. Redmi 13C 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and consistent performance, the Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G is the better choice. Its Dimensity 6100+ chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a noticeable efficiency advantage over the Poco C65’s Helio G85, translating to smoother multitasking and potentially longer battery life despite similar charging speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco C65 | Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 05 | 2023, December 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 06 | Available. Released 2023, December 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168 x 78 x 8.1 mm (6.61 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) | 168.1 x 77.9 x 8.2 mm (6.62 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 192 g or 195 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD | 18W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Purple | Starry Black, Twilight Blue, Starry Silver, Starlight Black, Startrail Green, Startrail Silver |
| Models | 2310FPCA4G, 2310FPCA4I | 23124RN87G, 23124RN87I, 23124RN87C |
| Price | € 99.95 / $ 139.99 / £ 115.99 / ₹ 8,999 | $ 198.99 / £ 119.00 / € 116.99 / ₹ 10,895 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Poco C65
- Brighter display (607 nits)
- Established gaming chipset (Helio G85)
- Good battery life (11:31h active use)
- Less efficient chipset (12nm)
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Older CPU architecture
Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G
- More efficient chipset (6nm)
- 5G connectivity
- More powerful CPU (Cortex-A76)
- Display brightness unknown
- Battery capacity unknown
- Camera specs largely unknown
Display Comparison
The Poco C65 boasts a display capable of reaching 607 nits of peak brightness, providing good visibility outdoors. However, the Redmi 13C 5G’s display specifications are not provided, so a direct brightness comparison is difficult. Both are likely to utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The Poco C65’s 1555:1 contrast ratio suggests decent color reproduction, but without knowing the Redmi 13C 5G’s contrast ratio, it’s hard to definitively say which offers a superior viewing experience. Users prioritizing outdoor visibility may lean towards the Poco C65 based on the measured brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to feature a multi-camera setup, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Given the price point, image quality will likely be similar in good lighting conditions. The Redmi 13C 5G’s camera system is unknown, but the Poco C65’s inclusion of photo and video capabilities suggests a basic but functional camera experience. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess which phone offers superior image quality, especially in low-light scenarios. It's safe to assume both will include a 2MP macro lens, which offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi 13C 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Poco C65’s Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, meaning the Redmi 13C 5G will likely run cooler and consume less battery for the same tasks. The CPU architecture also favors the Redmi 13C 5G; its Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.2 GHz) are more powerful than the Poco C65’s Cortex-A75 cores (2x2.0 GHz). This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both have six Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the overall performance advantage goes to the Redmi 13C 5G.
Battery Life
The Poco C65 achieves an impressive 11:31h of active use, demonstrating good battery endurance. Both phones share the same 18W wired charging with PD support. While the Redmi 13C 5G’s battery capacity is unknown, the Dimensity 6100+’s superior power efficiency suggests it could achieve comparable or even better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery. The 18W charging speed will likely result in similar 0-100% charging times for both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco C65 if you primarily consume media and play casual games, and 5G connectivity isn't a priority. Its slightly brighter display and established gaming chipset make it suitable for entertainment. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 13C 5G if you want a phone that’s ready for the future of mobile networks, offers better overall performance for everyday tasks, and benefits from a more efficient processor for improved battery longevity.