The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Poco C65 and Realme C67 4G are two contenders vying for your attention. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price, they take different approaches to achieving this, particularly in chipset choice and charging speed. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing efficiency and faster charging, the Realme C67 4G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 685 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers improved power efficiency compared to the Poco C65’s Helio G85. While the Poco C65 boasts a slightly longer active use battery score, the Realme C67’s 33W charging significantly reduces downtime.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 05 | 2023, December 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 06 | Available. Released 2023, December 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 168 x 78 x 8.1 mm (6.61 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) | 164.6 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.48 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~87.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 800 nits (typ), 950 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Purple | Sunny Oasis, Black Rock |
| Models | 2310FPCA4G, 2310FPCA4I | RMX3890 |
| Price | € 99.95 / $ 139.99 / £ 115.99 / ₹ 8,999 | About 160 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco C65
- Longer measured active use battery life (11:31h)
- PD charging support for wider charger compatibility
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
- Slower 18W charging speed
- Performance may throttle under sustained load
Realme C67 4G
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 685 chipset
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially smoother multitasking experience
- Battery life may be slightly shorter than Poco C65
- May be slightly more expensive than Poco C65
- No PD charging support
Display Comparison
The Poco C65 features a display capable of reaching 607 nits of peak brightness, providing adequate visibility outdoors. Its 1555:1 contrast ratio suggests decent black levels. However, the Realme C67’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. Given the market segment, it’s likely to offer similar brightness levels, but without measured data, we can’t assess its color accuracy or contrast ratio. The absence of high refresh rate panels on both devices suggests a focus on power conservation rather than fluid visuals.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are likely to feature similar camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without detailed sensor information beyond 'Photo / Video' for the Poco C65, a direct comparison is limited. It’s reasonable to assume both will include a primary sensor and auxiliary lenses (likely a depth or macro sensor). The image processing style will likely differ, with Xiaomi often favoring more saturated colors and Realme aiming for a more natural look. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco C65 utilizes the Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz. The Realme C67, however, employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm). This 6nm process is significantly more efficient than the Helio G85’s 12nm node, translating to lower power consumption and potentially less thermal throttling under sustained load. While the Poco C65’s Cortex-A75 cores offer higher peak performance, the Snapdragon 685’s Cortex-A73 cores, combined with the process node advantage, provide a more balanced and efficient experience for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.
Battery Life
The Poco C65 achieves an impressive 11:31h active use battery life, indicating good power management. However, the Realme C67 compensates for potentially smaller battery capacity (spec not provided) with its 33W wired charging, a significant upgrade over the Poco C65’s 18W charging. This faster charging speed translates to considerably less downtime, allowing users to quickly replenish their battery when needed. The Poco C65 also supports PD (Power Delivery), which is a welcome addition for compatibility with a wider range of chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco C65 if you prioritize maximizing on-screen time with a measured 11:31h active use battery life and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Realme C67 4G if you value a more efficient processor for smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and quicker charging – ideal for users who are frequently on the go and need to top up their battery quickly.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 685 in the Realme C67 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 685 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. While not a gaming powerhouse, its efficiency prevents significant overheating during extended gaming sessions, offering a more consistent experience than the Helio G85 which may throttle more aggressively.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Poco C65 with the 18W charger?
Given the 18W charging and likely battery capacity around 5000mAh, a full charge from 0% to 100% on the Poco C65 will likely take around 2.5 to 3 hours. This is considerably slower than the Realme C67’s 33W charging, which can achieve a full charge in approximately 1.5 to 2 hours.
❓ Does the Realme C67 support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
While not explicitly stated in the provided specs, Realme devices generally support VoLTE (Voice over LTE) and VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) in regions where these technologies are deployed by carriers. It's advisable to check compatibility with your specific carrier before purchasing.
❓ Is the image quality significantly different between the Poco C65 and Realme C67, considering both have similar camera setups?
Without detailed camera sensor information, it's difficult to say definitively. However, Xiaomi's image processing tends to boost saturation and contrast, resulting in more vibrant photos, while Realme often aims for a more natural look. The difference will likely be noticeable in color reproduction and dynamic range.
