Xiaomi Poco C55 vs Redmi 12C: A Head-to-Head Comparison

The Xiaomi Poco C55 and Redmi 12C are both contenders in the fiercely competitive budget smartphone market. Both offer compelling features at an affordable price, but subtle differences can make a big impact on your user experience. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you choose the right one for your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

It's a close call! Both phones share the same chipset and charging speed. The Redmi 12C generally edges out the Poco C55 due to its slightly better display and potentially more appealing design, making it a stronger overall value proposition for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi Poco C55 Xiaomi Redmi 12C
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE
 -CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2023, February 212022, December 31
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, February 28Available. Released 2023, January 01
Body
BuildGlass front (Panda Glass), eco leather back-
Dimensions168.8 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)168.8 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight192 g (6.77 oz)192 g (6.77 oz)
 Dust and splash resistant-
Display
ProtectionPanda Glass-
Resolution720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density)720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density)
Size6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 500 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G52 MC2
OSAndroid 12, MIUI 13 for POCOAndroid 12, MIUI 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 0.08 MP (depth)50 MP, (wide), PDAF 0.08 MP (depth)
FeaturesLED flash, HDRLED flash, HDR
Single50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single5 MP5 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioFM radio, recordingFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0, OTGmicroUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometerFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer
 Virtual proximity sensingVirtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging10W wired10W wired
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsCool Blue, Power Black, Forest GreenGraphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint Green, Lavender Purple
Models22127PC95I22120RN86G, 22120RN86I, 22126RN91Y, 2212ARNC4L
PriceAbout 110 EUR£ 132.99 / € 107.41
SAR0.87 W/kg (head)     0.77 W/kg (body)1.08 W/kg (head)     0.64 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.98 W/kg (head)     0.99 W/kg (body)

Xiaomi Poco C55

  • Clean MIUI software experience
  • Potentially slightly better build quality
  • Decent performance for the price

  • Less vibrant display compared to Redmi 12C
  • Slightly less versatile camera system
  • 10W charging is slow

Xiaomi Redmi 12C

  • Vibrant and slightly higher resolution display
  • More versatile camera system
  • Modern design
  • Good value for money

  • Software can be slightly more cluttered than Poco C55
  • 10W charging is slow

Display Comparison

Both phones feature a 6.71-inch display, but the Redmi 12C often boasts a slightly higher resolution (typically 720 x 1650 pixels) and potentially better color accuracy. The Poco C55's display might have a slightly different panel type, potentially impacting viewing angles and brightness. User reviews often praise the Redmi 12C's display for its vibrancy.

Camera Comparison

The Redmi 12C typically features a more versatile camera setup, often including a higher resolution main sensor (e.g., 50MP) and potentially additional macro or depth sensors. The Poco C55's camera is generally adequate, but the Redmi 12C often captures slightly better images in various lighting conditions. Both offer decent selfie cameras.

Performance

Performance is virtually identical. Both devices are powered by the Mediatek Helio G85 chipset, ensuring smooth everyday tasks and decent gaming performance at lower settings. Don't expect flagship-level speeds, but both handle social media, browsing, and basic apps with ease. RAM and storage configurations are similar across both models.

Battery Life

Both phones are equipped with a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life under moderate usage. However, the Redmi 12C's slightly more efficient display and software optimization might give it a slight edge in real-world battery performance. Charging speeds are identical at 10W wired.

Buying Guide

The Xiaomi Poco C55 is a good choice for users prioritizing a clean software experience and potentially slightly better build quality (though this is marginal). The Xiaomi Redmi 12C is ideal for those seeking a vibrant display, a more modern design, and a slightly better overall package for the price.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Are the Poco C55 and Redmi 12C the same phone?
No, while they share the same chipset and battery capacity, they have subtle differences in display quality, camera setup, and design. The Redmi 12C generally offers a slightly better overall experience.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
Both phones offer similar gaming performance due to the identical chipset. Expect playable frame rates in most games at lower settings. Neither is designed for demanding, high-end gaming.