Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Xiaomi Poco C51 and Samsung Galaxy F04 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy F04 edges out the Poco C51 thanks to its slightly faster processor, quicker charging, and generally more polished software experience. While both are budget options, the F04 offers a bit more value for the money, making it the preferred choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 07 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 13 | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1 mm (6.49 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 13 (Go edition), MIUI | Android 12, One UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP (depth) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Power Black, Royal Blue | Jade Purple, Opal Green |
| Models | MZB0E6DIN, MZB0DXKIN, 2302EPCC4I, 2305EPCC4G, 2302EPCC4H | SM-E045F, SM-E045F/DS |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | 0.38 W/kg (head) |
Xiaomi Poco C51
- Clean Android experience
- Decent battery life
- Affordable price
- Slow charging (10W)
- Less powerful processor
- Basic camera performance
Samsung Galaxy F04
- Slightly faster processor
- Faster charging (15W)
- Samsung's One UI
- Potentially better display
- Can still experience lag
- Basic camera performance
- Plastic build quality
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles for everyday use. However, the Samsung Galaxy F04 might have slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to Samsung's display technology, though this is difficult to definitively confirm without testing.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, with both offering a primary 13MP camera and a depth sensor. Image quality will be adequate for social media and casual photography in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will be subpar. Samsung's image processing might offer slightly more vibrant colors.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy F04's Helio P35 chipset holds a slight advantage over the Poco C51's Helio G36. While both are entry-level processors, the P35 generally offers a bit more responsive performance for multitasking and light gaming. Expect some lag on both devices with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate users. However, the Samsung Galaxy F04's 15W charging is faster than the Poco C51's 10W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco C51 is a good option for users prioritizing a clean Android experience and basic functionality. The Samsung Galaxy F04 is better suited for those who want a slightly faster performance, faster charging, and the familiarity of Samsung's One UI.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The Samsung Galaxy F04 generally offers slightly better performance due to its Helio P35 chipset compared to the Poco C51's Helio G36.
❓ How long does the battery last on each phone?
Both phones likely offer all-day battery life with moderate usage thanks to their 5000mAh batteries.
❓ Which phone is better for photography?
Neither phone excels in photography. Both offer basic camera capabilities suitable for casual use in good lighting conditions.
