The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Poco C50 and Infinix Smart 7 HD are two contenders vying for your attention. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly affordable price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison will dissect their key specifications to determine which device offers the best overall experience for the average user.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Infinix Smart 7 HD emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones share the same slow 10W charging, the Smart 7 HD’s octa-core CPU provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Poco C50’s quad-core Helio A22, making it more responsive for everyday tasks and light multitasking.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 03 | 2023, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 10 | Available. Released 2023, April 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1 mm (6.49 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) | 163.9 x 75.5 x 8.7 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 196.5 g (6.95 oz) |
| | Dust & splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 500 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core 1.6 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | - |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | - |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 12 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP (depth) | 8 MP, f/2.0
0.08 MP, (depth) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Auxiliary lens | 8 MP, f/2.0
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Country Green, Royal Blue | Ink Black, Silk Blue, Jade White, Green Apple |
| Models | MZB0D3DIN, 220733SPI, 220733SPH | X6516 |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | 0.87 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco C50
- Recognizable Xiaomi brand
- Android Go Edition for optimized performance on limited hardware
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Quad-core processor limits performance
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely basic camera system
Infinix Smart 7 HD
- Octa-core processor for smoother multitasking
- Potentially better value for money
- More responsive user experience
- Less established brand recognition
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely basic camera system
Display Comparison
Neither Xiaomi nor Infinix provide display specifications beyond size. Given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolution. The absence of detailed specs suggests neither phone will excel in color accuracy or brightness. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a budget-friendly design. The user experience will be similar in terms of visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are likely to feature basic camera setups. Without detailed sensor information, it’s safe to assume both rely on low-resolution primary sensors paired with auxiliary lenses of questionable utility. Image quality will be heavily reliant on software processing, and users should expect limited performance in low-light conditions. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device further limits their photographic capabilities. Focusing on the primary sensor resolution (if available) will be more important than the presence of macro or depth sensors.
Performance
The core difference lies in the processors. The Poco C50 utilizes the Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22, a quad-core processor clocked at 2.0 GHz. This is a relatively basic chipset designed for extremely light workloads. Conversely, the Infinix Smart 7 HD features an unspecified octa-core processor clocked at 1.6 GHz. While the clock speed is lower, the eight cores provide significantly improved multitasking capabilities. The Smart 7 HD will handle app switching and running multiple applications concurrently with less lag and stuttering. The Helio A22 in the Poco C50 will struggle with even moderate multitasking.
Battery Life
Both the Poco C50 and Infinix Smart 7 HD are equipped with 10W wired charging. This is a significant limitation, meaning a full charge will take a considerable amount of time – likely exceeding 3 hours. While battery capacity isn’t specified, both phones are likely to house batteries in the 5000mAh range, offering all-day battery life with moderate usage. The slow charging speed is a major drawback for both devices, but the more efficient octa-core processor in the Smart 7 HD might translate to slightly better battery endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco C50 if you prioritize brand recognition within the Xiaomi ecosystem and are comfortable with a very basic user experience optimized for Android Go Edition. This is a good option for first-time smartphone users or those needing a simple, reliable device for calls and messaging. Buy the Infinix Smart 7 HD if you prefer a more responsive device for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming, and value the benefits of an octa-core processor for a smoother multitasking experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco C50 struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
The Poco C50’s Helio A22 processor is designed for basic tasks. While it can run WhatsApp and Facebook, you may experience noticeable lag when switching between apps or loading media. The Smart 7 HD’s octa-core processor will handle these apps more smoothly.
❓ Is the Infinix Smart 7 HD suitable for playing mobile games?
The Infinix Smart 7 HD can handle very light mobile games, but don’t expect a high-performance gaming experience. Demanding titles will likely run with low frame rates and significant lag. The Poco C50 will struggle even more with gaming due to its weaker processor.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge either phone?
With only 10W charging, expect a full charge to take over 3 hours, potentially closer to 4. Neither phone offers fast charging capabilities.
❓ What is Android Go Edition on the Poco C50, and how does it affect performance?
Android Go Edition is a lightweight version of Android designed for devices with limited processing power and RAM. It uses less storage space and data, and features optimized apps. While it improves performance on the Poco C50, it still can't overcome the limitations of the Helio A22 processor.
