Xiaomi Poco C40 vs Samsung Galaxy A14: The Ultimate Budget Battle

The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Poco C40 and Samsung Galaxy A14 are two contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at affordable prices, but which one delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A14 generally wins due to its superior chipset, smoother performance, and more refined software experience. While the Poco C40 boasts a massive battery, the A14's overall package provides better value for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi Poco C40 Samsung Galaxy A14
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2022, June 062023, February 28
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, June 17Available. Released 2023, March 27
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2 mm (6.68 x 3.02 x 0.36 in)167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight204 g (7.20 oz)201 g (7.09 oz)
 Dust & splash resistant-
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass-
Resolution720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density)1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)
Size6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 400 nitsPLS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B
ChipsetJLQ JR510 (11 nm)Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B
GPUMali-G57 MC1Mali-G52 MC2
OSAndroid 11, MIUI 13 for POCOAndroid 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens-
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single5 MP, f/2.213 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Triple-50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single5 MP, f/2.213 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE
Infrared portYes-
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS
RadioFM radioUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired15W wired
TypeLi-Po 6000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsPower Black, Coral Green, Poco YellowBlack, Dark Red, Silver, Green
Models220333QPGSM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R
PriceAbout 110 EUR€ 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95
SAR EU-0.46 W/kg (head)     1.37 W/kg (body)

Xiaomi Poco C40

  • Exceptional battery life
  • Very affordable price
  • Large display
  • Expandable storage

  • Underpowered chipset
  • Basic camera
  • Low-resolution display
  • Slow charging

Samsung Galaxy A14

  • Better performance (Exynos version)
  • Improved camera quality
  • Brighter and sharper display
  • Samsung's One UI
  • 5G connectivity (depending on region)

  • Slower charging
  • Battery life not as impressive as Poco C40
  • Price slightly higher than Poco C40

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A14 typically features a slightly larger and brighter display with a higher resolution, offering a more immersive viewing experience. The Poco C40's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and sharpness of the A14. Both use LCD panels.

Camera Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A14 generally offers better camera performance, with improved image processing and more detail in photos. While both have multiple lenses, the A14's main sensor and software optimization provide superior results. The Poco C40's camera is functional but lacks the refinement of the A14.

Performance

The Samsung Galaxy A14, particularly the Exynos 850 version, holds a significant advantage in performance. The Helio G80 is decent, but the Exynos 850 offers noticeably smoother multitasking and app loading. The Poco C40's JLQ JR510 chipset is quite underpowered and struggles with demanding tasks.

Battery Life

The Xiaomi Poco C40 shines in battery life, thanks to its massive 6000mAh battery. It can easily last two days on a single charge. The Samsung Galaxy A14, with its smaller battery, still offers good battery life but won't match the Poco C40's endurance.

Buying Guide

The Xiaomi Poco C40 is ideal for users prioritizing maximum battery life and a very low price point, willing to compromise on performance. The Samsung Galaxy A14 is a better choice for those seeking a more balanced experience with a faster processor, better camera, and the reliability of the Samsung brand.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset. The Poco C40 struggles with even basic games.
❓ Does the Poco C40 support 5G?
No, the Poco C40 does not support 5G connectivity. The Samsung Galaxy A14 may offer 5G depending on the region and specific model.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally provides longer software update support than Xiaomi, making the Galaxy A14 a more future-proof choice.
❓ Is the Poco C40 worth it if I only need a phone for calls and basic apps?
Yes, the Poco C40's exceptional battery life makes it a good option for users with minimal usage needs and a tight budget.