The Android tablet market is heating up, with Xiaomi and Realme offering compelling options at different price points. The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro aims for near-flagship performance with its cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, while the Realme Pad X focuses on delivering a solid experience at a more accessible price. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right tablet for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite offers a substantial leap in processing power. However, the Realme Pad X provides excellent value for everyday tasks and media consumption, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| EDGE | N/A | - |
| GPRS | N/A | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 25 | 2022, May 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 25 | Available. Released 2022, June 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 251.2 x 173.4 x 5.8 mm (9.89 x 6.83 x 0.23 in) | 256.5 x 161.1 x 7.1 mm (10.10 x 6.34 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 485 g or 494 g (1.07 lb) | 499 g / 506 g (1.10 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic charging) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~344 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~213 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.2 inches, 373.7 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.95 inches, 341.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 19mm (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5 | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+
22.5W reverse wired | 33W wired, PD
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 9200 mAh | 8340 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Green | Glowing Gray, Glacier Blue, Green |
| Models | - | RMP2107, RMP2108 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1664:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-22.5 LUFS (Excellent)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 395824 (v9)
GeekBench: 2026 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
- Significantly faster processor for demanding tasks
- 67W fast charging for quick power-ups
- Potential for a higher-quality display
- 22.5W reverse wired charging
- Likely higher price point
- Potential for increased heat under sustained load (though 3nm helps)
Realme Pad X
- More affordable price
- Good display brightness and contrast
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Portable and lightweight design
- Slower processor compared to the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
- Slower 33W charging
Display Comparison
The Realme Pad X boasts a measured peak brightness of 496 nits and a 1655:1 contrast ratio, providing a reasonably vibrant viewing experience. However, the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro, while lacking specific display specs in the provided data, is positioned as a premium device and likely features a superior panel. The Realme Pad X’s 1664:1 contrast ratio is respectable, but the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro’s potential for a higher resolution and color accuracy, typical of its segment, would be a significant advantage for content creators and visual professionals. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests neither will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Neither tablet is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and the provided data doesn't offer detailed camera specs. However, given the Realme Pad X’s market positioning, it’s likely to feature a more basic camera setup. The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro, being a premium device, may include a higher-resolution main sensor and potentially more advanced image processing capabilities. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison, but the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro is likely to deliver better image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro’s Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) with its Oryon V2 Phoenix cores represents a significant generational leap over the Realme Pad X’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process node translates to improved thermal efficiency and performance per watt, crucial for sustained workloads. The Oryon cores, designed by Qualcomm, offer a substantial CPU performance advantage over the Kryo 660 cores in the Snapdragon 695. This means faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro. The Realme Pad X is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro’s 67W wired charging is a major advantage, allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the Realme Pad X’s 33W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro mitigates any potential disadvantage from a smaller battery. The 22.5W reverse wired charging on the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro is also a useful feature for topping up other devices, while the Realme Pad X offers a more limited 5W reverse wired charging capability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro if you need a tablet for demanding tasks like video editing, graphic design, or gaming, and appreciate the benefits of a cutting-edge processor and faster charging. Buy the Realme Pad X if you prioritize portability, a comfortable viewing experience for media, and a lower price point for everyday use like browsing, streaming, and light productivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Realme Pad X struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is a mid-range chipset and will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in demanding games like Genshin Impact. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential stuttering. The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite is far better equipped to handle such titles at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro compared to the 33W charging on the Realme Pad X?
While exact times depend on battery capacity, 67W charging will significantly reduce charging times. Expect the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro to go from 0-100% in approximately 45-60 minutes, while the Realme Pad X will likely take 90-120 minutes. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to quickly top up their tablet.
❓ Is the difference in processor performance between the two tablets noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and streaming?
For basic tasks like web browsing, video streaming, and social media, the difference in processor performance may not be immediately apparent. However, the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro will feel more responsive and smoother when multitasking or switching between apps due to its more powerful chipset.
